The article 40 year structural inspections was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 30 August 2024 with a consensus to merge the content into Surfside condominium collapse. If you find that such action has not been taken promptly, please consider assisting in the merger instead of re-nominating the article for deletion. To discuss the merger, please use this talk page.
Do not remove this template after completing the merger. A bot will replace it with {{afd-merged-from}}.
This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
News items involving this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "In the news" column on June 25, 2021, June 26, 2021, June 27, 2021, June 28, 2021, June 29, 2021, June 30, 2021, July 1, 2021, and July 2, 2021.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Civil engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Civil engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Civil engineeringWikipedia:WikiProject Civil engineeringTemplate:WikiProject Civil engineeringCE articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management articles
This article is part of WikiProject Miami, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to the Miami metropolitan area on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.MiamiWikipedia:WikiProject MiamiTemplate:WikiProject MiamiMiami articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Florida. If you would like to join us, please visit the project page; if you have any questions, please consult the FAQ.FloridaWikipedia:WikiProject FloridaTemplate:WikiProject FloridaFlorida articles
Latest comment: 2 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Can someone check the veracity of this sentence, "..reportedly taken at 1:18 a.m., seven minutes before the north-central portion of the building collapsed.[181][182.."? The issue is that the partial collapse is reported to have occurred at 1:22am (some sources give 1:23am), which is only 4 (or 5) minutes later although I believe I have read also that the video was taken before 1:18am, possibly 1:14am (going from memory here), so there may be some confusion surrounding when the video was taken, when the collapse occurred & the intervening minutes. Thanks 120.16.225.92 (talk) 09:33, 9 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Should we have a sub-section giving additional (and maybe undue) weight to the theory (blame) of the nearby tower construction if no engineering report has ever suggested it as a cause? What if instead create another section called 'other theories' or 'other possible causes'? Just a suggestion. Thanks ! Jtbobwaysf (talk) 09:37, 13 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 1 month ago3 comments2 people in discussion
I see 40 year structural inspections went through AfD with a result to merge. I don't see anything that can really be merged that hasn't been stated. I think maybe the specific codified language could be added but these look like notes from the editor. If I knew about the AfD at the time, I would have gone for userify the page as they are solid notes that could have been provided to this talk page for a discussion. Thoughts? @SSR07 @Oaktree b – The Grid (talk) 16:13, 16 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
Hello! Sorry it has taken so long to get back to you. Thanks for helping sort this out. Could you explain what "userify the page" means? I don't know what all the jargon means yet, sorry! SSR07 (talk) 21:11, 29 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
Userify simply means the content on an article could be moved to a user's page for their own notes. One of my own examples, is here. The content is more of notes, not in a full prose format, and not ready to be made into an article. The content 40 year structural inspections is similar as they are listing notes about the process but not in prose format. Surfside_condominium_collapse#Legislation kind of covers what needs to be addressed already. – The Grid (talk) 16:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
