Talk:Sword of state

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Blades, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.BladesWikipedia:WikiProject BladesTemplate:WikiProject BladesBlades articles

Politics

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Requested move

Latest comment: 12 years ago7 comments7 people in discussion

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved to Sword of state. Favonian (talk) 09:37, 19 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

Sword of State → Sword of state – As can be seen by the article, this is about the generic term, not a specific "Sword of State", and should therefore be decapitalised per WP:CAPS/MOS:CAPS. Jenks24 (talk) 05:02, 12 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

Support. Yep, makes sense to me. I don't think the move will upset anyone.--Brianann MacAmhlaidh (talk) 05:26, 12 April 2012 (UTC)Reply
Support—generic. $Tony (talk)$ 05:45, 12 April 2012 (UTC)Reply
Support See no reason for denial; fairly common sense and per policy. Judicatus (talk) 08:08, 12 April 2012 (UTC)Reply
Support generic. In ictu oculi (talk) 00:27, 13 April 2012 (UTC)Reply
Support per nom. ENeville (talk) 22:28, 18 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Add topic