Talk:Symphony in Three Movements

Self Contradiction

This article has been listed as Self Contradiction, but no indication of the contradiction has been left in notes or on this discussion page. Please review for Self Contradiction and if none exists, delete the tag or fix and then delete the tag. Kjnelan (talk) 06:35, 17 July 2009 (UTC)

BUMP! was going to say the same. if someone else comes along in, say, a month and still can't see any contradiction (or indication of what the contradiction is here on the talk page), just remove that tag. --Arkelweis (talk) 15:31, 28 September 2009 (UTC)

tag was added here by Jerome Kohl --Arkelweis (talk) 15:38, 28 September 2009 (UTC)

I tagged it because in one sentence it said the style was that of Stravinsky's enfant terrible period (which is not one of the usual classifications, but I presume to refer to his "Russian" period, since the Rite of Spring is specifically mentioned), whereas a later sentence identified it with his neoclassical style. I see that the article has since been altered to address the issue, by describing it as a combination of his enfant terrible language with neoclassical form. The "contradiction" tag should have been removed at that time.—Jerome Kohl (talk) 18:49, 28 September 2009 (UTC)

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Symphony in Three Movements which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 12:16, 7 September 2017 (UTC)