Talk:North American T-2 Buckeye

(Redirected from Talk:T-2 Buckeye)
Latest comment: 8 years ago by Cyberbot II in topic External links modified

Smart Looking Bird!

edit

I know it's original research, but have always liked the look of the Buckeye - shame there aren't more on the civilian registry.

agreed, very attractive.
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on North American T-2 Buckeye. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 03:18, 19 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Really?

edit

This article states: "The T-2C was fitted with two much more powerful 2,950 lbf (13,100 N) thrust General Electric J85-GE-4 turbojets." This appears to contradict other information in this article that talks about the T-2B having 2x3000 lbf thrust engines - how can a 2950 lbf thrust engine be "much more powerful" than a 3000 lbf thrust engine?