Talk:Plan Táctico y Estratégico de la Guerra
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Can I edit this?
editI believe TEG stands, actually, for Plan Tactico y Estrategico de la Guerra, which would be translated into Plan of War Strategy and Tactics or War Strategy Plan and Tactics. Why the P for Plan is not abbreviated, I do not understand (this would be interesting to note). But you can trust my sources since 1) I'm an Argentine person, 2) I know spanish as my primary language (Obviously) 3) I am in posession of a version of the game, and at the very side of the box, it says T.E.G. Plan Tactico y Estrategico de la Guerra. Also, I believe this article should be more than a stub, so if I find any more information, I'll be glad to share it. Please tell me if I can edit this or if someone else will.Slartibartfast1992 04:15, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
It's because it would be like "Tactics and Strategies for War" "Tacticas y Estrategias de Guerra". I'm from Argentina and I have the old version and the new of the original teg (not "la revancha").
Feel Free to edit! |
---|
I am also editing this article by adding it lots of information, but you can edit too... It would be great if you could add even more information...
Note: Please see the message I have left you concerning this article. |
Thanks! I think we could place an image of the board next to the "board" section, as to show the reader how the board is. Also, a picture of the materials (dice, board, cards, etc.) could be place next to a new section listing materials, should this new section be reasonable. Apart from that, a picture of the box might be useful at the top of the article, where the definition is given. Slartibartfast1992 23:59, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
Those are great ideas! I have already taken some pictures myself with a digital camera and will soon upload the images and insert them on this article. --TomasBat (Talk) 12:28, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
- It's been two years... what about that promess? --Againme (talk) 16:36, 10 March 2009 (UTC)