Talk:Takalik Abaj/Archive 1

Archive 1

Tak'alik A´baj text in case anything should be incorporated here

Below text was at Tak'alik A´baj by User:Authenticmaya. Tak'alik A´baj was redirected to this article.

Tak’alik A’baj is located in the Guatemalan Pacific Low Lands, far away from Petén at the North, making it the biggest Mayan city in the Pacific Ocean coastal area in Mesoamérica, the city is also interesting due to its long occupation periods (800 BC to 900 AD), it is the only site in Mesoamerica with Olmec influences in the early years and Mayan influences afterward, and was a important commerce centre mainly with Kaminal Juyú and Chocol in what is now Guatemala City, and with Chocolá, to the east

The site is located in El Asintal, Retalhuleu some 118.06 milles (190 km) from Guatemala City in a paved road about 3 hrs, driving, during witch you will enjoy the major Volcanoes of Guatemala.

It has 82 monumental structures, including an astronomical observatory, temples, terraces, etc. and 282 monuments known to date, including impressive stelas and altars. The materials used are granite stones much different from the lime stone used in the Petén cities. Source UVG, Dr Marion Popenoe de Hatch

Long Count dates on stelae?

Would someone be so kind as to translate the Long Count dates shown on the lower of the two stelae graphics? The stone in the upper image appears to be too worn to see the whole date, but there are two dates on the lower graphic that would be interesting to know more about. Cheers -- Erik Anderson, 207.118.47.246 (talk) 15:36, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

See Mesoamerican_Long_Count_calendar#Origin_of_the_Long_Count_calendar for the translation/transliteration of the dates listed on Stela 5. That article explains how to read Long Count dates, etc. Hope this helps, Madman (talk) 16:10, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

It turns out that the drawing was flipped (r to left). That may account for some of the problem. Madman (talk) 03:58, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

Amazing job

My watchlist was showing you'd been working on this article, so I thought I'd stop by and see how things are coming along. I was amazed at the content you've added -- wow! Keep up the good work!! Madman (talk) 03:58, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

Thanks Madman - as with Quiriguá, I'm buried under mountains of information, so I think I can keep going for a while yet... Best regards, Simon Burchell (talk) 07:25, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

I fully agree with Madman: Fantastic work! Just out of curiosity: what criterion did you use to include certain terraces/structures/altars/monuments/stelae? Availability of sources or best preserved or something else? bamse (talk) 09:42, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

Thanks Bamse. Inclusion of terraces, monuments etc. was down to availability of sources. Any that are not included are not sufficiently described in the sources I have available. I would have liked to give a far more detailed description of the terraces of the Central Group, for example, but had very little info. Best regards, Simon Burchell (talk) 09:52, 16 February 2009 (UTC)