A fact from 1754 Taunton by-election appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 5 February 2015 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Somerset, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Somerset on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SomersetWikipedia:WikiProject SomersetTemplate:WikiProject SomersetSomerset articles
These are automatically generated by the template, to remove them I would have to build the table from scratch. However, I have filled one in, and put dashes in the other, which hopefully alleviates this concern? Harriastalk10:37, 15 April 2015 (UTC)Reply
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.
It would be ideal if the websites cited as references in this article were specially archived, lest they succumb to link rot in the coming years. Midnightblueowl (talk) 16:27, 10 April 2015 (UTC)Reply
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).
There are a few examples where I feel that we could use in-line references to a greater degree. For instance, in the first paragraph of "Vacancy and nominations" we have two sentences before a citation appears. Now I appreciate that that citation probably covers the information in both sentences, but that would be clearer were the citation to appear at the end of each sentence. This could help prevent misunderstandings in future, particularly from those editors who like to slap a "citation needed" tag on almost every sentence without one. Midnightblueowl (talk) 16:16, 10 April 2015 (UTC)Reply
I think that it would nevertheless be good to have some more information on both eighteenth-century Taunton and on Britain's political situation at the time in the "Background" section. That way, the reader won't have to start clicking on links to Whig and the like in order to understand what this particular article is talking about. As it stands, the reader really does have to have a background understanding in eighteenth-century British history to properly appreciate this article's content. Midnightblueowl (talk) 16:27, 10 April 2015 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for your review. Due to some delays, I'm travelling for the next couple of days, so it might be a few days before I get back to this. Harriastalk17:16, 10 April 2015 (UTC)Reply
Back home now, but have the typical pile of work to catch up on. Will try and find some time for this before the weekend though. Harriastalk21:31, 14 April 2015 (UTC)Reply
.svg){kind=small}
