Talk:Teach the Controversy
![]() | The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to pseudoscience and fringe science, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Teach the Controversy article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8Auto-archiving period: 60 days ![]() |
![]() | The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to pseudoscience and fringe science, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
![]() | Arbitration Ruling on the Treatment of Pseudoscience In December of 2006 the Arbitration Committee ruled on guidelines for the presentation of topics as pseudoscience in Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Pseudoscience. The final decision was as follows:
|
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
this article should be deleted
editThere is no controversy. Evolution is real. We should not pretend like it exists and therefore we should delete this article 99.101.56.68 (talk) 18:16, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
- This is not an article about evolution, it is an article about a political stratagem. tgeorgescu (talk) 18:51, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Requested move 22 March 2023
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Page moved back to Teach the Controversy. (closed by non-admin page mover) Jerium (talk) 18:10, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
Teach the controversy (campaign) → teach the controversy – unnecessary parenthesis. Teach the controversy redirects here. Marsbar8 (talk) 00:41, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
- Support alternate move to Teach the Controversy, the original title before it was unilaterally moved without discussion. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 04:31, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
- Move back to stable title Teach the Controversy, per above. 162 etc. (talk) 15:58, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
- Support move to Teach the Controversy per above replies. 〜 Festucalex • talk 16:26, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
- Support per above. Seungri400 (talk) 19:50, 23 March 2023 (UTC)