Talk:Templo Mayor

Latest comment: 1 year ago by 2601:600:C681:45C0:E71F:257E:A7BA:82B2 in topic Number of sacrifices

Number of sacrifices

edit

From the article:

between 3,000 and 84,000 people were sacrificed over 4 days during its reconsecration

That's an awfully big range. I hope that's a typo. As is, it's fairly meaningless -- better to say "thousands." Cleduc 05:55, 2 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

The number 84,000 conflicts with 'Human sacrifice in Aztec culture' wiki page


The information about human sacrifice is more than doubtful, the subject has recently been opened up again. Until a decade ago scholars have unquestioningly accepted claims of the Spanish conquerers (both Cortes and Díaz indulge the "rivers of blood", while they themselves never witnessed one instance of sacrifice). Archaeologist Moctezuma rightly points out that no one ever found more than a handful of sacrifial victims on the precincts. Please verify with recent publications. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.208.17.51 (talk) 03:29, 18 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

10,000-84,000 apparently cited in this 2003 publication, which itself is cited in 'Human sacrifice' wiki page. The notion of at least some human sacrifice at this prominent site is consistent with the widely documented practice (including in codexes published by Aztec people themselves), and the complete omission of it from this page is staggering. At least address it as a controversy rather than simply erasing (aka censoring).
Hassig, Ross (2003). "El sacrificio y las guerras floridas". Arqueología Mexicana (63): 46–51. ISSN 0188-8218. 2601:600:C681:45C0:E71F:257E:A7BA:82B2 (talk) 05:15, 24 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Correct Name and Translations

edit

im kinda confused by the first line of the article. "Great Pyramid" in english translates as "Pirámide Mayor" in spanish. and "Templo Mayor" in spanish translates as "Great Temple". which one is correct, or are they both (due to different names by different people)? either way, the spanish name used isnt in italics as called for by the Manual of Style. and a translation isnt given. the way it reads right now, the article makes it seem to a non-spanish speaker that the second name in bold is a direct translation of the first. the spanish article calls it only the "Great Temple", but notes that its actually a "double temple", formed by a truncated pyramid. 4.230.168.252 02:15, 31 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

The temple was only 30 meters heigh, not 60

name in Aztek?

edit

What was the name of the temple in Aztec? Should the article not be moved to that name instead of the Spanish name? Gryffindor (talk) 13:30, 2 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Templo Mayor is the current name of the archaeological site, with associated museum. Since the temple is no longer standing I would have thought the Spanish name is appropriate, especially since that is what INAH uses to refer to the site. Many Mesoamerican archaeological sites use their modern names rather than the name they were originally known by, even when this is known (Tikal for example). Regards, Simon Burchell (talk) 13:38, 2 March 2010 (UTC)Reply
I see. But what is (was) the native name of the temple? Gryffindor (talk) 16:02, 2 March 2010 (UTC)Reply
Bizarrely, none of my sources give a name for the building as a whole (at least not one that I can locate quickly) but various books refer to Huitzilopochtli's half as Coatepec ("Serpent Hill") where the god was born and Tlaloc's half as Tonacatepetl, the mythical place where maize was stored by the gods. It is implied in one or two of my books that the building as a whole might have been referred to as Coatepec, but not stated outright. Regards, Simon Burchell (talk) 18:08, 2 March 2010 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Templo Mayor. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 13:54, 11 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Templo Mayor. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:02, 2 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Split?

edit

Should there be separate articles for Templo Mayor and Templo Mayor Museum?

Spanish Wikipedia has es:Templo Mayor and es: Museo del Templo Mayor. ---Another Believer (Talk) 16:06, 26 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Golden Eagle Sculpture

edit

Just parking this link here as reference for anyone wishing to expand this article:

https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/archaeologists-unearth-600-year-old-obsidian-eagle-mexico-180976894/?mc_cid=40668319e4&mc_eid=bdae36ca30 J. Van Meter (talk) 16:10, 5 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

wooden artifacts

edit

Recently found wooden artifacts:UPDATED 21 JUNE, 2022 - 14:49 NATHAN FALDE "Mexican Archaeologists Find Over 2,500 Rare Wooden Aztec Artifacts!" in Ancient Origins, a blacklisted online magazine. This article seems legit, though. Let's discuss it on the spam white-list page. Kdammers (talk)