Talk:Terry Pratchett: Choosing to Die

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the British cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the Documentary films task force.

Death: Suicide Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Suicide task force (assessed as Low-importance).

WP:FILM Assessment

Latest comment: 13 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

The article was requested for re-assessment, and after reading the article I'd also agree that it should remain C class for now. To bring it up to B-class, see if the article can be further expanded. Further critical reviews could be added to flesh out the reception section. See if anything additional can be found on the production, music, accolades, etc. The lead should also be expanded to better summarize the article beyond the two current sentences. It's good to see so many citations, but seek out more to determine if the article can be further expanded. As a side note, citations should go directly after the punctuation to remain consistent throughout the article. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 04:44, 29 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

I sadly feel that the article cannot be expanded any further. There is no public information on production except what's already included in the article; there is also no information available on music, and the film hasn't been nominated to any awards and has not received anything yet. It hasn't been reviewed critically (no results on Rotten Tomatoes nor on Metacritic nor anywhere else); all non-professional, public critique has already been included in the #Reception section. I am receiving daily reports on any further information about the film but unfortunately nothing notable has been published since I wrote the article. As for the punctuation, should I try not to add sources mid-sentence or should I move them after the semicolons? Not being a native speaker of English I am not used to the English punctuation guidelines very much... but I tried my best in following the MOS. Anyway, thank you for your comment, it's appreciated! Regards, odder (talk) 21:37, 30 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

As the film just came out this month, I'd give it another month or so to see if any reviews or other articles trickle in. It's going to premiere in the U.S. in July, so there may be some critical reviews that show up at that point. If, at that point there is still no sources that are still available, then the article will have met all of the sourcing requirements and qualify as B class. I'd still recommend expanding the lead to better summarize the article, try and touch on each section to develop it. I've fixed the spacing of the citations, moving them after the semicolons and commas. If you want me to take another look at this in a month or so, let me know on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 23:23, 30 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Add topic