Talk:Eggplant Software

Learn more about this page

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:

Conflict of Interest

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The majority of contributions seem to be from the same region and usernames that indicate a connection to this company without proper notification on the user pages indicating a conflict of interest, paid or otherwise. Also, the tone of the article is not completely neutral. Specifically, two lines appear to be company marketing material:

Many of these products work together. For example, real user journeys from monitoring can be used to build journeys for functional testing.
It was created to help organisations put users at the centre of software testing to create amazing digital experiences and drive user adoption, conversion, and retention. After an initial round of seed funding ($100,000), the company was able to invest in developing technologies ─ predominately the Digital Automation Intelligence Suite ─ which interacts with software exactly like a real user does.

There are inconsistencies in formatting, such as the capitalization of list items.

The research section does not represent real research but is an extension of the awards section. The awards section doesn't need to indicate the company has won the Queen's Award. Just listing Queen's Award is guideline-appropriate.

This article requires either a substantial rewrite from a completely neutral party or conflict of interest indicators from the apparent company editors.

-Bwright — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.25.174.98 (talk) 09:26, 27 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Add topic