Talk:Black Lesbian and Gay Centre

(Redirected from Talk:The Black Lesbian and Gay Centre)
Latest comment: 5 days ago by PCN02WPS in topic Did you know nomination

Draft in progress!

edit

Hello Wikipedians! This is a draft in progress, at the Feminist Library Wikithon. Brand new editors are still adding to this page. Please do leave any comments / concerns here, or feel free to talk to me! Thank you so much :) Fran Medievalfran (talk) 14:20, 6 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Did you know nomination

edit

Created by Fomoriii (talk) and Medievalfran (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 106 past nominations.

Lajmmoore (talk) 17:33, 7 October 2024 (UTC).Reply

General: Article is new enough and long enough

Policy compliance:

  • Adequate sourcing:  
  • Neutral:  
  • Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:   - Just a little close paraphrasing to clean up: The centre found a permanent home in 1992 in a converted railway arch in Peckham is a little too similar to the source wording ...in 1992 the BLGC finally found a permanent home in a converted railway arch in Peckham, South London in my opinion.

Hook eligibility:

  • Cited:   - Very minor wording issue with ALT0 - the source says they "supported" the boycott, the article says they "organised" it, and the hook says they "joined" it. I think all instances should reflect the wording in the source as these three can mean different things.
  • Interesting:  
QPQ: Done.

Overall:   A cite for the one cn tag would be good but I won't hold this up just for that. Earwig looks good apart from the close paraphrasing noted above (basically all of the other similarity is a direct quote, which is attributed and cited. QPQ is good as well. I'm cool with either hook, both interesting IMO and sourcing checks out apart from a small wording question. (Just a note, I have named the reference used for ALT1 so the reference itself isn't duplicated). After the two issues above are resolved we should be good for a tick! PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 15:37, 9 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thanks very much for the review PCN02WPS - I've addressed the missing reference, the disparity in wording for ALT0 and the close paraphrasing. Lajmmoore (talk) 18:27, 9 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
  Sweet! Good to go. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 01:07, 10 October 2024 (UTC)Reply