Talk:Bob Martin Petcare
This article was nominated for deletion on 5 January 2009. The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
editPoint taken but any potential copyright infringment fixed. This is a famous Britsh brand, with a long history. It should have a Wikipedia page.
Format now tidied up and lots more information.
The Business Wire article meets the notability criteria for a company —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.7.93.194 (talk) 22:55, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
The Business Wire item is not an article, it's a press release, and therefore says nothing at all about notability. --CalendarWatcher (talk) 10:27, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
It's a press release for a Datamoniter article about pet healthcare in South Africa. If it were a Bob martin press release (or had anything to do with Bob Martin), I would see your point. As things stand, I don't get where you're coming from at all. The press release states that the subject of the article is the market leader in South Africa, thus establishing notability. Case closed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Restraining (talk • contribs) 12:20, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
It's a press release, full-stop. A press release is not a reliable source, especially regarding notability. Case actually closed. --CalendarWatcher (talk) 13:29, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
This is surely semantics. It is no more a press release than it is an extract of a reliable, third-party, published source. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Restraining (talk • contribs) 15:45, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
advertisement tag
editI would like to remove the advertisement tag. My reading of the article is not spammy and just lists the products served. I will leave this up to consensus though. Thanks. ShoesssS Talk 16:10, 5 January 2009 (UTC)