Talk:The Gold It's in the...

Instruments

This track sounds like Gilmour played all the instruments. There doesn't appear to be any keyboards, the bass is quite a different style from usual, quite a lot of fast plectrum picking and the drums are a lot simpler with fewer rolls. Does anybody have any proof?

--62.140.197.253 17:14, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

Good call! I bet you're right -- and I'm not even much of a Gilmour whore.

Still, though, even if it is true . . . so what, if we don't have a source?

--63.25.14.189 (talk) 02:41, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

Move?

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was not moved. Aervanath (talk) 16:17, 14 June 2009 (UTC)

---

The Gold It's in the... → The Gold It's in The... — caps — Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 03:00, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

• This has come up before, the ... is the last word of the title, not "the". 199.125.109.88 (talk) 03:09, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
• An ellipses is not a word, it is punctuation, just like a trailing period or question mark. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:50, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
• An ellipsis represents missing final words, therefore some say that the word "the" is not properly final. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 08:32, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
• This was recently discussed here. Jafeluv (talk) 17:33, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
• Mu. Dekimasuよ! 15:03, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Page moved. The previous discussion did not support a move so having this moved without another discussion that resulted in a consensus to move is problematic. So with this being uncontested, returning to the status quo is called for. Vegaswikian (talk) 18:31, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

The Gold It's in The... → The Gold It's in the... — As far as I can tell, all online versions of this title have the second "the..." in lower case. I do not own a physical copy of this, so I cannot say for sure.Hoops gza (talk) 03:16, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Move? (2)

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: not moved. Favonian (talk) 11:05, 13 September 2011 (UTC)

---

The Gold It's in the... → The Gold It's in The... –

• WP:CAPS —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:07, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
• But see results of previous discussions above. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 05:50, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
• Oppose. I'm generally a huge proponent of WP:CAPS, but some common sense should be used here. The "the" is capitalised in none of the sources and, as Anthony said in the first RM, the ellipses represents missing words. Jenks24 (talk) 15:39, 6 September 2011 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Do Not Delete This Article Or Merge It

It was the only studio song from Piper At The Gates of Dawn to The Wall without an article and I think it deserves an article and not to be singled out as "that one song without the article." — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mrmoustache14 (talk • contribs) 23:33, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

Irony

A lot of the article is a criticism of the song, which is ironic because It's one of my favorites, but sadly I need to provide popular opinion over my own... critics... --Mrmoustache14 (talk) 23:42, 28 August 2012 (UTC)