Talk:History of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union (Bolsheviks)
(Redirected from Talk:The History of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union (Bolsheviks))
Latest comment: 5 years ago by SS49 in topic Requested move 30 July 2019
 | This  level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=small}
,_Emblem_of_Russia_(1991%E2%80%931992).svg)
More on content
editShould discuss some of the notorious historical falsifications in the book (upgrading Stalin's role in 1917, etc.). AnonMoos (talk) 19:52, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
Soviet historiography
editAccording to the Russian page the book influenced Soviet historiography.Xx236 (talk) 07:34, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
- The English article as it now stands includes a few vague words like "propagandist", but doesn't mention any of the book's falsehoods... AnonMoos (talk) 21:37, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
Lead
editThe lead for the article is extremely similar to the description that Amazon has for the book https://www.amazon.com/History-Communist-Party-Soviet-Bolsheviks/dp/1490917098/ref=pd_lpo_sbs_14_img_0?_encoding=UTF8&psc=1&refRID=30QRW09RCHRN021EG0G9 .Joecantu1134 (talk) 11:30, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
Requested move 30 July 2019
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved (non-admin closure) ~SS49~ {talk} 07:50, 6 August 2019 (UTC)
The "The" doesn't seem to be part of the title name, should it be removed?--80.180.196.242 (talk) 10:44, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
- Support Agree with Nom that the actual title is "History of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union (Bolsheviks)". This would appear to be an uncontroversial move given that page-naming policy discourages extraneous "The"s, but let's weight to see if anyone else weighs in. FOARP (talk) 11:27, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
- Support as above, the publication title does not start with "The". I suggest also removing the introductory word "The" from the start of the WP:FIRSTSENTENCE. 92.249.211.16 (talk) 12:00, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
- I also note that Short Course is a redirect to Short course (about swimming) as
{{R from other capitalisation}}, but because the article lede says that this book is "[c]olloquially known as the Short Course", it may deserve a hatnote (and retargeted per WP:DIFFCAPS?) 92.249.211.16 (talk) 12:10, 30 July 2019 (UTC)- I've turned Short Course into a disambiguation page. Station1 (talk) 02:00, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
- I also note that Short Course is a redirect to Short course (about swimming) as
- Support per WP:THE. Beginning an article with "the" is discouraged when unnecessary. Rreagan007 (talk) 15:00, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
- Support per title page of book. Station1 (talk) 02:00, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.