This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greater Manchester, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greater Manchester on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Greater ManchesterWikipedia:WikiProject Greater ManchesterTemplate:WikiProject Greater ManchesterGreater Manchester articles
This article is part of WikiProject Gender studies. This WikiProject aims to improve the quality of articles dealing with gender studies and to remove systematic gender bias from Wikipedia. If you would like to participate in the project, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.Gender studiesWikipedia:WikiProject Gender studiesTemplate:WikiProject Gender studiesGender studies articles
This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
This article should not be speedy deleted as having no substantive content, because... I work for the LGBT foundation and am attempting to create an accurate, professional wikipedia page. The Lesbian and Gay foundation is now an outdated page and was made by someone who does not represent this organisation and mentioned himself in the article more often that he should have. I attempted to make a page yesterday but left out all of my references. I attempted to edit the page with the upper case letters today but was not given that option and was instead redirected to the old page, hence I made a new page with lower case letters in the title. --FelixTy95 (talk) 10:18, 27 May 2015 (UTC)Reply
If it's the same organisation under a different name, then the content should be added to the existing article. Also, please read WP:COI as you work for the organisation- just because someone who doesn't work for the foundation of the page created The Lesbian and Gay Foundation, this doesn't make it less legitimate than your page. Although your page does seem to be better, text about both organisations hsould be included on The Lesbian and Gay Foundation page, as this is a content fork- it's the same organisation, just focusing on the recentisms of it.
In second thoughts, I'll just perform a merger/redirect from the old page to this one, since the old one is pretty bad, and this one is clearly better. Joseph2302 (talk) 10:34, 27 May 2015 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I followed the link to reference 5, 'Charity Report' which does not provide support for any of the statements made in the previous sentence: the size of the charity or the services offered. ChimTubb (talk) 19:23, 10 February 2016 (UTC)Reply
