Talk:The Peoples Political Party

Canada: Ontario / Politics Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Ontario portal This article is supported by WikiProject Ontario.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Political parties and politicians in Canada.

Politics: Political parties Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Political parties task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Mention of Gender

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I'm just wondering why Gender is one of the categories in the Electoral results/candidates tables. I don't think it is too unusual that a fringe party, running between two and four candidates in each election, happens to have all male candidates. If there were mention of some kind of gender bias surrounding this party in the mainstream reliable sources then it would make sense that Wikipedia highlight it; but as it is, it doesn't really seem WP:NEUTRAL and verges on WP:OR for the article to highlight this semi-relevant fact. — Who R you? Talk 18:37, 3 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Issues

Latest comment: 6 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

I think the notability and citation issues notes from September 2011 can be removed at this point, considering the greater depth of the article now compared to when those tags were added.James Hyett (talk) 00:01, 22 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

I don't think it's really that much better. Four sentences is not greater depth in my opinion. Sorry to be so brash. I think I may have been the one who added that info about the platform back in 2011, lol. Bkissin (talk) 01:44, 22 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Fair enough! James Hyett (talk) 16:14, 22 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Add topic