Talk:The Phantom of the Opera (song)

edit

Thanks. Imagine Reason (talk) 13:22, 20 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Isn't it an Eb6?

edit

It is in the movie at least. I checked it with a piano and the movie's soundtrack. If no one objects, I will change this. 75.71.228.165 (talk) 06:41, 23 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Original promo version?

edit

I read somewhere that an original promo version single was released, done by Sarah Brightman and Steve Harley, before Harley was dropped from the cast. Can anyone confirm this? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Agbneill (talkcontribs) 17:45, 6 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Removal of dab line

edit

The dab line "For the Iron Maiden song of a similar name, see Phantom of the Opera (song)." was removed in this edit on the basis that

"The Phantom of the Opera does not redirect here. Please see Wikipedia:Hatnotes#Disambiguating_article_names_that_are_not_ambiguous for an explanation of why this is an error."

Firstly, no-one claimed that The Phantom of the Opera *did* redirect here, and that obviously wasn't the rationale- the link is specifically to the other song.

Secondly, the allegedly-supporting linked article gives a case that *does* make sense and conveys the principle as well. No-one is likely to arrive at the Tree (set theory) article expecting to find something else- there's only one use of *that* and anyone searching or following links isn't likely to be confused by it.

On the other hand, Phantom of the Opera (song) and The Phantom of the Opera (song) are quite likely to be confused, as they have very similar titles and the definite article is frequently forgotten or mis-inserted. I know this because it's precisely the reason I arrived at the wrong article!- I was looking for the Iron Maiden song, typed in "The Phantom of the Oper..." and the autocomplete included the The Phantom of the Opera (song) in the list. Bingo! Er, no... I got the Lloyd-Webber one.

Which I already knew about, but wondered where the Iron Maiden one was, as I didn't know that lacked "The". No other confusion was likely so (e.g.) we don't need a link back to the main dab page, or to the novel or anything else. But we do need one for a very-similarly named song.

If the assumption is that "ambiguity" does not exist if two articles have slightly different titles, then I believe that this is mistaken; the purpose of dab hatnotes and dab articles is to meet the navigational needs of *people*, and it's quite likely that many people like myself *will* make this mistake (i.e. it's potential "ambiguity" in people's *minds*). Hence, I've restored the dab hatnote. Cheers! Ubcule (talk) 18:36, 30 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for notifying me of this discussion. In order to address your concerns about potential confusion between these two songs, I have moved this article to a title that cannot be confused with the other song and redirected the titles that are potentially confusing to the relevant disambiguation page. I hope that you will be content with this compromise. Neelix (talk) 20:41, 30 May 2014 (UTC)Reply
That's one solution, and almost certainly a better naming choice *if* we were starting from scratch. Unfortunately, we're not, and The Phantom of the Opera (song) still redirects here and until it doesn't, the {{redirect}} is needed.
Of course, the obvious response to that is that The Phantom of the Opera (song) should be repointed to the dab page anyway... which I'd agree with *except* that there are lots of indirect links intended to go to the Lloyd-Webber song article that would break if that was done without repointing them.
I appreciate that this might be somewhat fiddly, but it's one of the annoying but necessary implications of deciding to move a pre-existing page if one wants to do it properly (and something that's more than once put *me* off making moves that would otherwise be a good idea).
OTOH, I notice you're an admin, so you probably already know this :-) and (I'm assuming) know which tools might be helpful in doing this with less drudgery. All the best, Ubcule (talk) 21:03, 30 May 2014 (UTC)Reply
I had already taken care of the redirect as well as the incoming links before you posted your message. The Phantom of the Opera (song) redirects to the disambiguation page, and there are no articles that link to that title anymore. Please let me know if you have any additional concerns. Neelix (talk) 20:24, 31 May 2014 (UTC)Reply
No problem, there must have been some overlap between my checking and posting then. Seems okay now, cheers! All the best, Ubcule (talk) 20:29, 31 May 2014 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on The Phantom of the Opera (Andrew Lloyd Webber song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 16:51, 17 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on The Phantom of the Opera (Andrew Lloyd Webber song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 22:05, 26 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on The Phantom of the Opera (Andrew Lloyd Webber song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:30, 31 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Different versions

edit

This article talks mainly about the version by Brightman and Harley, which was released as a single. Not so much about the version in the actual staged musical and not at all about the version in the film release of 2004.

There are several versions in orchestration. I'm not familiar with the released version by Brightman and Harley for the pop charts, but I know that the version on the album of the original West End cast is a lot less rock-music-ish (which, IMHO, fits a lot better in the staged musical as a whole.) And later (potentially since the film release of 2004) the rock-music-ish version got reintroduced (to my frustration.) I'd love to see this article talk more about different version and re-interpretations. However, I don't have the answers and so far I have been unsuccessful finding information on this through search engines. Jurjenb (talk) 00:34, 24 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Nightwish!?

edit

Why is there a Nightwish template in the footer!? I would judge it has insufficient relation with the subject. Jurjenb (talk) 00:41, 24 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on The Phantom of the Opera (Andrew Lloyd Webber song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:46, 20 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 9 May 2020

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Page moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Jerm (talk) 17:42, 16 May 2020 (UTC)Reply


The Phantom of the Opera (Andrew Lloyd Webber song)The Phantom of the Opera (song) – Per WP:SONGDAB, we only have one article about a song named "The Phantom of the Opera". (Phantom of the Opera (Iron Maiden song) is potentially notable, but 1. it's not a single; 2. it does not currently have an article; 3. the lack of "The" in its title suffices as disambiguation.) Even if further disambiguation were needed, SONGDAB guidelines suggest that "The Phantom of the Opera (Sarah Brightman and Steve Harley song)" would be a more appropriate title than the current one, as the guideline prefers using the name of the performer who first performed the song over the name of the composer. feminist | wear a mask 12:02, 9 May 2020 (UTC)Reply


The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.