Talk:The Shires (duo)
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Requested move 6 January 2016
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Not moved per consensus below, and changing The Shires to redirect to Shire (disambiguation) since there is multiple possible targets, none of which are primary. No consensus on the change of (country duo) to simply (duo), feel free to relist that if further discussion is warranted or desired. (non-admin closure) Tiggerjay (talk) 17:55, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
The Shires (country duo) → The Shires – Already redirects here. Unreal7 (talk) 17:59, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
- Strong Oppose per WP:PRIMARYTOPIC (which this duo is not); the target has only recently (22 October 2015) been repointed here, the Shires should instead repoint to go to Shire (disambiguation) along with all the other uses of "The Shires is" and "The Shires are" from Google Books. In ictu oculi (talk) 22:01, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
Bernard Newman Portrait of the Shires 1968 - Page 10 "The Shires is a recognized term, but is nevertheless somewhat vague. The three counties included in the expression are Leicestershire, Rutland and Northamptonshire. Several packs which hunt within these limits are not supposed, however, ..."
- Strong oppose the target was changed in October 2015, prior to that, for 7 years, it was a different target. The redirect should become a disambiguation page. -- 70.51.44.60 (talk) 05:14, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose. The Shires should actually redirect to Shire (disambiguation). It was (and sometimes still is) a very common term used to refer to the English countryside (as opposed to London and the other industrial towns). -- Necrothesp (talk) 15:12, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
- Move to The Shires (duo), no other duo to be distinguished from. © Tbhotch™ (en-2.5). 03:51, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
"Shire"
editThe article says:
- "Shire" is the original term for what is usually now known as a county in the United Kingdom.
But the OED says of shire:
- In Old English times, an administrative district, consisting of a number of smaller districts (‘hundreds’ or ‘wapentakes’), united for purposes of local government, and ruled jointly by an ealdorman and a sheriff, who presided in the SHIRE-MOOT n. Under Norman rule, the division of England into shires was continued, the Anglo-Norman counté, Anglo-Latin comitatus, being adopted as the equivalent of the English term.
Sounds a lot smaller than a county. How small? I don't know. But "Shire" does say:
The "Shire" article also doesn't suggest that the term was used anywhere in Ireland. -- Hoary (talk) 22:23, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on The Shires (duo). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20140513042522/http://www.soundslikenashville.com/artist/shires/ to http://www.soundslikenashville.com/artist/shires/
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20150402184657/http://www.chriscountry.co.uk/the-shires-and-ward-thomas-to-co-headline-a-tour-in-november/ to http://www.chriscountry.co.uk/the-shires-and-ward-thomas-to-co-headline-a-tour-in-november/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:11, 20 July 2016 (UTC)