Talk:The Sims 3
 | Stuff packs for The Sims 3 was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 28 September 2022 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into The Sims 3. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here. |
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the The Sims 3 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find video game sources: "The Sims 3" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk |
| Archives: 1, 2, 3 |
 | Discussions on this page often lead to previous arguments being restated. Please read recent comments and look in the archives before commenting. |
 | This page is not a forum for general discussion about The Sims 3. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about The Sims 3 at the Reference desk. |
 | The Sims 3 was a Video games good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
 | A news item involving this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "In the news" column on June 2, 2009. | |||||||||
 | This talk page is for discussion on how to improve the The Sims 3 article. If you would like to ask questions about the subject, please address them to the Reference desk. |
Archive 3
editToday, March 23, 2013, I have archived the recent talk to Archive 3 of The Sims 3 talk page. Previous two edits are war but misunderstood due to me not leaving any notice. This is the official notice of /Archive 3 to The Sims 3 Talk Page. Sundogs Wikia UserPage 19:02, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
- Minor edit - The Good Article Review is listed on Archive 3's listing. Sundogs Wikia UserPage 19:04, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
The Sims 3 expansion and stuff packs listing together?
editSince the Good Article review suggested that The Sims 3 expansion packs and stuff packs be on its own listing, my question is this, if we decide to split The Sims 3 games, i.e. core game with expansion and stuff packs, onto one listing, should we remove The Sims 3: Stuff Packs article and merge it into a new article with core / expansion pack / stuff pack article listing? I think the core / expansion pack / stuff pack article is wise, and thus, eliminating the stuff pack article (in my honest opinion) because we don't need two lists of stuff packs. So, this is a public vote! (and note the good article review is in the Archive 3 article page; see archive list above for link). Sundogs talk page sandbox 01:09, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
Should we split the Game Play of The Sims 3?
editAs the good article reviewer stated, in archive 3, the reviewer stated that we should spin-off the game play into its own article entitled Gameplay of The Sims 3 and I am willing to do the work, since it is listed on commissioned work on sandbox (can be found here),and so, I am asking those to look at the good article review, link found here, and leave your vote and/or opinions here. I am asking the public-at-large to vote on this and message above. Sundogs talk page sandbox 01:17, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
January 2014: Multiple issues
editI have tagged the Gameplay section of this article for multiple issues pertaining to its content and verification. The sheer excessive detail this section gets into is overwhelming, and a clear violation of WP:GAMEGUIDE and WP:GAMECRUFT. Wikipedia's goal is to present concisely-written information to the reader, who has no previous experience with the subject, and guide them into further research through sourcing. There is virtually no sourcing throughout the entire section at all. According to WP:VG's quality scale, B-Class material must be suitably referenced. The criteria also explains that material must reasonably cover the topic (read: stray away from excessive detail) and be written with as broad an audience as possible. As the article appears to fail the B-Class Criteria, I am also demoting it to C-Class. CR4ZE (t) 12:19, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
Weird links to The Sims 3
editHere are weird links to The Sims 3. Is this ok? --Transiturus (talk) 09:10, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
- Looks like those are all actors from Yo soy Betty, la fea. I've retargeted the remaining ones accordingly. Ionmars10 (talk) 11:51, 6 May 2021 (UTC)