Talk:The Trap (Captain Scarlet and the Mysterons)/GA1

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Aircorn (talk · contribs) 06:06, 19 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
    Not bad. A few redundancies "storm lightning". Some overlinking "visibility" "grill" "gunpoint". Repitition "Script editor, script editor".
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
    There are no independent sources for this article. They are needed to not only show that the episode is notable, but they are more likely to provide unbiased commentary.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
    There is no reception section. This is a vital aspect for any television article.
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
    Hard to judge the neutrality without a reception section
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
    Stable.
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  
    The article needs a reception and ratings section. Add this and then re-nominate for another review. AIRcorn (talk) 06:06, 19 November 2011 (UTC)Reply