Talk:UK Pitbulls
This article was nominated for deletion on 19 January 2018. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(
Is it me
editThis seems to be one of those self edited ego pieces —Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.189.206.61 (talk) 19:28, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
- Yea, over the last couple of months this article has been turned on its head.. well best guess it would be this user --- Paulley (talk)
So it's obviously a vanity piece,I've noticed it's had adverse comment edited out over the last few months.Does it deserve to remain in Wikipedia? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.189.206.61 (talk) 20:53, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
Well the team itself is notable, that many tag titles by a single team is notable esspecially as its from companies throughout Europe making them known through out more than the independent scene of one country. However, the tone of te article and its content needs to be assessed, referenced and condenced into a valid article. --- Paulley (talk) 11:57, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
Neither of them have really done anything of note in years. They won titles in minor wrestling promotions & are using this page to promote their moribund careers.It's about time it was deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.68.73.125 (talk) 19:29, 28 April 2014 (UTC)