Talk:Museum theatre

(Redirected from Talk:Third-person interpretation)
Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified (February 2018)

US only?

edit

All the examples given are from the US. Are these techniques used in other countries, or is this primarily a US phenomenon? Either way, the article should say. Also, if it is primarily a US activity, I suggest that US spellings should be used, such as "theater" rather than "theatre", because "[a]n article on a topic that has strong ties to a particular English-speaking nation uses the English of that nation". cmadler (talk) 16:54, 4 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

The spelling of museum theatre has been widely established in seminal texts like the Tessa Bridal book and the Catherine Hughes book, so I do not believe that it should be changed because it would not be true to the scholarly discourse of the topic. I do agree that the P.O.V. should be broadened to include the international museum theatre movement like the Science Museum of London, where Hughes did much of her research and work. I will try to work on this and rewording of the intro soon. CLAvalon (talk) 03:48, 5 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Museum theatre. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:05, 9 February 2018 (UTC)Reply