Talk:Tideway

Latest comment: 6 days ago by 216.154.2.233 in topic Tidal activity

Environment

edit

I think a citation is needed for the claim that sewage outflows into the river happen 'several times a year' - I only recall one in recent memory (maybe the last 5 years?), during a flood period. Mildlydiverting (talk) 10:03, 3 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Ooh, talking to myself - I've found some (not very well organised) data on the DEFRA / Environment agency sites that confirms the volume of sewage outflow issues. Will see if can add in a sensible way to the article. Mildlydiverting (talk) 10:48, 3 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Tidal Reaches

edit

Please could the article include something about the tidal reaches of the Thames. How are they defined and what are the names (eg. Blackwall Reach, Erith Reach ...)? --Rob Kam (talk) 10:35, 3 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Now included, copied from Watermen#See_also --Rob Kam (talk) 20:47, 2 September 2013 (UTC)Reply
I have added the two lower reaches, the Lower Hope and Sea Reach. Pterre (talk) 16:46, 3 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Modern map needed

edit

History

edit

Needed. Some sources give Londinium as the tidal limit of the Thames at the time of its founding, while Staines-upon-Thames claims it was the tidal limit until the 14th century. — LlywelynII 17:33, 22 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Tideway. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 17:45, 14 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Tideway. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 21:01, 29 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Tidal activity

edit

Someone requested clarification/citation for "Because the tide goes against the outflow of fresh water from the Thames Basin, it takes longer to subside (6–9 hours) than it does to flow in (4–5 hours).[clarify][citation needed]"

I don't have a citation but I think I can clarify. Whereas a bay without a river flowing into it would only have water flowing in from the ocean during a rising tide, the river has has water flowing both downstream and in from the ocean causing it to rise faster. Conversely when the tide turns the river continues to flow downstream, like trying to drain a tub with the faucet still running. 216.154.2.233 (talk) 06:40, 25 November 2024 (UTC)Reply