Talk:Timbral listening
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Timbral listening article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
help with clarifying
editany clues and feedback as to what is confusing about the article would be helpful and much appreciated. Cotton32 (talk) 08:02, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
- I don't see anything at all confusing or unclear here, so have remove the tag. Phil Bridger (talk) 09:17, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
Neologism
editThe deletion of an article you created, Timbral Listening, has been proposed for the following reason: Neologism with no asserted usage.
in reference to this - please see published references and further reading at the bottom of the article which use the term 'timbral listening'. Is this really a Neologism? or is there another one in the article? This is my first article and I have read all the help pages and tutorials but perhaps I am missing something? Any help would be much appreciated. Cotton32 (talk) 16:44, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
stub
editin reference to this article being a stub and not containing enough information - extra information is being added over the next few days so please bear with me! Cotton32 (talk) 16:44, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
- Don't worry, it's surely no longer a very short article and it provides context, which is why speedy deletion was declined. It might be challenged again in the future, though, on grounds of WP:NOTABILITY, to be either merged into Timbre or deleted. --AmaltheaTalk 17:12, 29 October 2008 (UTC)