Talk:Timeline of the Syrian civil war (January–April 2013)

So much propaganda and bias in this article I don't know where to begin — Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.180.117.168 (talk) 20:56, 5 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

I agree. This "article" should be deleted because it doesnt meet Wiki criteria. Ratipok (talk) 20:06, 15 January 2013 (UTC)Reply
Seems like the above unsigned comment is POV to me, I think the ISS is about as reliable as the Syrian Government. But without them there would be noting to report really. Enlil Ninlil (talk) 11:12, 23 January 2013 (UTC)Reply
The above comment is an IP sock of MalesAlwaysBest Darkness Shines (talk) 11:15, 23 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

I do agree that the daily tally of deaths is unnecessary. This is also the only place i have ever seen the opposition names of the fridays. Its seems strange to include those in a wikipedia page since i have never seen it being used by any RS. Also the statement from Enlil Ninlil about there being nothing to report without the LCC is simply untrue. There are daily reports from RS about Syria. Liquidinsurgency (talk) 23:59, 26 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

A daily death toll is a daily death toll. There is nothing wrong with it. You are free to add SOHR and SANA reports on the daily death toll. Just keep in mind we use SOHR, LCC, and SANA sources STRICTLY for the death toll. Nothing else. We don't use direct LCC or SANA reports for battle information. Sopher99 (talk) 02:51, 27 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Listing Israel endangers neutrality

edit

Israel is listed as a location for this conflict since November 11. This causes problems for Wikipedia neutrality, as the events in question did not occur within internationally recognized borders of Israel, but in the Israeli occupied Golan. This area is internationally recognized as part of Syria, Israel has however unilaterally annexed this area. Placing claims that these clashes on and near Golan happened in Israel can be construed as taking the Israeli POV. If however we change location of the war to parties involved, we would be remaining neutral on the annexation issue as IDF involvement in these events is unquestionable. Either way, we need to do something. 169.202.5.161 (talk) 11:06, 28 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

I copied the infobox from the main page. Could you please raise the issue there? Thanks. --Emesik (talk) 13:03, 28 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Done Sopher99 (talk) 15:44, 28 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

LCC Civlians killed by Syrian Army

edit

Where exactly does the reports by the LCC say that the killed where civlians killed by the army? --Liquidinsurgency (talk) 20:22, 17 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Also, if its from the interest of the article to provide us with daily death rates, why there is only the Syrian Arab Army killings and not also the FSA and other groups inflicted casualties in the civilian population? ˜˜˜˜

LCC is also problematic as it characterizes those killed as 'martyrs' without distinguishing between civilians and rebel fighters. We should rather stick to SOHR for casualty figures.--41.76.208.114 (talk) 06:06, 15 April 2013 (UTC)Reply
Fixed the language used there. --Emesik (talk) 11:44, 18 April 2013 (UTC)Reply
In my personal opinion these timeline articles shouldn't include the daily LCC claims of the number of dead at all. Because it's not encyclopedic and Wikipedia should be an encyclopedia. The timeline articles should stick to major political and military events that happen in the conflict and mention a death toll when there is a massacre or a battle with a high number of deaths. EkoGraf (talk) 06:20, 22 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Pure propaganda

edit

This article is filled with one source reports from a page close to free syrian army. It does not contain numbers of "martyrs" killed by FSA and most likely fakes real numbers of deaths. In Libyan civil war timeline provided information about movements of army and important happenings but this article is full of propaganda shit therefore should be removed or properly cleaned.

lccsyria.org

edit

How is this even a remotely reliable source? Darkness Shines (talk) 14:21, 2 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

It is not, and it's obviously biased. However, it's the only source giving some estimate of body count, even though it seems to forget about loyalist casualties. --Emesik (talk) 14:45, 2 May 2013 (UTC)Reply
Then this needs to be attributed at the least, the source is pure junk. Darkness Shines (talk) 14:49, 2 May 2013 (UTC)Reply
SANA and LCC are fine for reporting daily death tolls. Sopher99 (talk) 04:15, 3 May 2013 (UTC)Reply
Have you seen daily death tools from SANA? --Emesik (talk) 12:05, 3 May 2013 (UTC)Reply
edit

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and according to fair use may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Diannaa (talk) 19:11, 31 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on Timeline of the Syrian Civil War (January–April 2013). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 13:03, 26 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Timeline of the Syrian Civil War (January–April 2013). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 19:21, 7 July 2016 (UTC)Reply