Talk:Tolkien and the Norse
Latest comment: 1 year ago by GimliDotNet in topic GA Review
Tolkien and the Norse has been listed as one of the Language and literature good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: May 5, 2023. (Reviewed version). |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Tolkien and the Norse/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: GimliDotNet (talk · contribs) 20:05, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
I'll start to review this article. I've not added any content to it and am quite familiar with the general concepts discussed.
- Many thanks, looking forward to it! Chiswick Chap (talk) 20:28, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
- Another good bit of work. Happy to mark as GA. GimliDotNet (talk) 18:16, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a. (reference section):
- b. (citations to reliable sources):
- c. (OR):
- d. (copyvio and plagiarism):
- a. (reference section):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a. (major aspects):
- b. (focused):
- a. (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
- b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/fail:
- Pass/fail: