Talk:Tolkien and the Norse

Latest comment: 1 year ago by GimliDotNet in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Tolkien and the Norse/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: GimliDotNet (talk · contribs) 20:05, 4 May 2023 (UTC)Reply


I'll start to review this article. I've not added any content to it and am quite familiar with the general concepts discussed.

Many thanks, looking forward to it! Chiswick Chap (talk) 20:28, 4 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
Another good bit of work. Happy to mark as GA. GimliDotNet (talk) 18:16, 5 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a. (prose, spelling, and grammar):  
    b. (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a. (reference section):  
    b. (citations to reliable sources):  
    c. (OR):  
    d. (copyvio and plagiarism):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a. (major aspects):  
    b. (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):  
    b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/fail:  

(Criteria marked   are unassessed)