Talk:Tom Laughlin

(Redirected from Talk:Tom Laughlin (actor))
Latest comment: 5 years ago by 2604:6000:E48B:B600:70BB:C242:2E5D:AF9A in topic Delores Taylor Date of death
Former good article nomineeTom Laughlin was a Media and drama good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
October 5, 2004Articles for deletionKept
June 15, 2009Good article nomineeNot listed
March 15, 2010Peer reviewReviewed
April 20, 2010Good article nomineeNot listed
Current status: Former good article nominee

Comment by JN322

edit

I added a list of the books he's published over the years. Or at least the ones I know about. All but one (I think) are out of print, and some were self-published, so if you think its unnecessary to keep the list, feel free to get rid of it. JN322 16:42, 21 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

I'm fixing this

edit

Tom is my favorite actor and this page is a disgrace. If you don't mind I'm going to make it not suck. BillyJack193 (talk) 13:57, 23 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Will try to work on this more later, but I've fixed a lot of things, added some new info and made it a much better article up to 1974 at least. BillyJack193 (talk) 15:37, 23 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Done with my rewrite. Going to get a peer review now. BillyJack193 (talk) 19:30, 23 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

GA Review

edit
This review is transcluded from Talk:Tom Laughlin/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Article content

edit
Infobox
  • Under the 'Other name(s)' field, is has he really released work under these aliases? There are a few that aren't mentioned within the article text.

==Yes, he has. He was billed as Tommy Laughlin in The Delinquents. He directed 5 films under the name T.C. Frank, directed two others and produced an additional one as Don Henderson, produced a film using the name Mary Rose Solti, directed two films as Frank Laughlin, written a film as Frank Cristina, and one as Lloyd E. James. BillyJack193 (talk) 13:47, 19 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Lead
  • The lead does not adequately summarize the entire article. Please review WP:LEAD and expand as necessary.
Early life and film career
  • The first paragraph seems to jump straight into his college years. Is there any other information regarding his childhood or adolescence?
Honestly, there's not much that I could find, but I'll look again.BillyJack193 (talk) 13:47, 19 June 2009 (UTC)Reply
  • There are some problematic sentences and paragraphs in this section. For example, some paragraphs are only one to two sentences long.
  • I also noticed that, when compared to the next section (Leaving Hollywood), the article fails to be set in a chronological sense. This should be fixed.
It is in chronological order. The later dates in the first section are the film's release dates. They were filmed much earlier. BillyJack193 (talk) 13:47, 19 June 2009 (UTC)Reply
  • The acronym 'NFL' should be expanded.
Fixed BillyJack193 (talk) 13:47, 19 June 2009 (UTC)Reply
  • After his college life, it also jumps right into his teaching. What lead him to teach? What happened "after his hopes of being a professional athlete panned out"?
Again there is very little information to be found. BillyJack193 (talk) 13:47, 19 June 2009 (UTC)Reply
  • …in addition to guest lecturing at other universities throughout the country. Which country?
Fixed BillyJack193 (talk) 13:47, 19 June 2009 (UTC)Reply
  • He also appeared in Gidget (1959) as "Lover Boy". What is Gidget and who was "Lover Boy"?
FixedBillyJack193 (talk) 13:47, 19 June 2009 (UTC)Reply
  • However, Laughlin and Altman apparently did not get along. "Apparently" throws this sentence off. If they did not get along, this word should be removed. If it's untrue or has not been verified, this sentence should be removed entirely.
FixedBillyJack193 (talk) 13:47, 19 June 2009 (UTC)Reply
Leaving Hollywood

This section is a bit short. Perhaps it would be suited best to be merged with another section.

Politics

Again, problematic sentences and paragraphs in this section (paragraphs that are only one to two sentences long, etc.).

Personal life
  • In 2001, the public learned Laughlin was suffering from cancer of the tongue. This sentence would probably best be written as: In 2001, it was announced that Laughlin was suffering from cancer of the tongue. Also, would there happen to be a specific type of cancer he was suffering from? I've made a few changes myself to comply with WP:MOS.

Billy Jack Years You mentioned "depicting a tribe that does not exist, the "Nishnobie." Since Tom is from the Minnesota Wisconsin area, I suspect he was most likely influenced by the tribal name of the peoples who populate the great lakes region; the Anishnaabe, or as said in some dialects Nishnabe. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.150.165.202 (talk) 05:35, 12 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Media review

edit
  • There isn't any media in the article. Though not mandatory, have you tried looking for a free image on Flickr of Laughlin?

General comments

edit
  • Using the dablinks finder tool, I found three links that lead to disambiguation pages: AIP, Mount St. Mary's and Remission. These should be linked to the correct articles.
  • Using the Checklinks tool, I found that: [1] is too small of a file, which probably means it doesn't cite anything; that [2] redirects to [3] (which should be fixed).
  • None of the references seem to be formatted corrected. Please format the references using the proper citation template.
  • What makes the following websites reliable sources?
    • YouTube
    • filmfanatic.org
    • Answers.com
    • viewpoints.com
    • houseofselfindulgence.blogspot.com
    • critcononline.com
    • movieactors.com
    • badmovies.org
    • jabootu.com
    • captainsquartersblog.com
    • democraticunderground.com/discuss
  • This article needs a thorough copy-edit. I'd also suggest taking this article to be peer reviewed, to get additional help and comments from uninvolved editors.

Result

edit

  Unfortunately, I am quick-failing this article. There are several issues that I noted above in the article, which may take excessive time (beyond the traditional seven-day hold), mainly huge gaps missing in his biography and the fact that it's a bit poorly written. You may renominate this article for WP:GAN any time after the issue above have been addressed. If you feel that this review was incorrect, feel free to leave a note on my talk page or have the article reviewed at WP:GAR. Thank you. — Σxplicit 02:42, 15 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

WP:RS and WP:Peacock

edit

It needs a lot of pruning on these points. Laughlin's own site is credited for some pretty outrageous claims. DavidOaks (talk) 00:35, 13 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Donald Henderon / Don Henderson

edit

Does anyone have any source to verify that Tom Laughlin is indeed the "Don Henderson" who directed the films "Babysitter," "Weekend with the Babysitter," and "Touch of Satan"? Laughlin used the name "Donald Henderson" on a couple of films (as an editor on one, producer on another).71.228.199.230 (talk) 05:42, 10 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

GA Review

edit
This review is transcluded from Talk:Tom Laughlin/GA2. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: –– Jezhotwells (talk) 19:05, 13 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: none found

Link rot: two dead links found and tagged. The YouTube video has been removed; the Google News cache has gone, generally these do not last very long.

Checking against GA criteria

edit
GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS):  
    There are a lot of very short one and two sentence paragraphs. It would be better to consolidate these into slightly longer paragraphs.
    Make sure that quotes have leading quotation marks, e.g. At a private screening, Senator Vance Hartke got up, because it was about how the Senate was bought out by the nuclear industry. He got up and charged me. Walter Cronkite's daughter was there, [and] Lucille Ball. And he said, 'You'll never get this released. This house you have, everything will be destroyed.' [I]t was three years later, he gets indicted for the exact crime that we showed in the movie." See WP:Mos#Quotation marks
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
    ref #4 [4] fails verification, it just refers to "the Tom Laughlin ineligibility muddle". there is nothing that really substantiates those two sentences.
    ref #76[5] Template:Cite episode has a paramater for saying where (in minutes and seconds) the particular passage is that supports the statement. It would be best to use this as this a lengthy segment
    References are to reliable sources, and apart from the exceptions above support the cited statements. There are two dead links as noted above.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
    No images used.
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  
    OK, on hold for above issues to be addressed. Jezhotwells (talk) 20:01, 13 April 2010 (UTC)Reply
    I shall be looking at this again on 20 April, nothing has been done to address these concerns yet as far as I can see. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 22:10, 19 April 2010 (UTC)Reply
    Well apart from one minor revert by the nominator there has been no attempt to address these issues so I am failing the nomination. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 20:31, 20 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Marriage age

edit

So his wife was only 16 when she got married? RlevseTalk 01:58, 4 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Tom Laughlin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 20:11, 28 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Tom Laughlin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:43, 27 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Tom Laughlin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:08, 20 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Delores Taylor Date of death

edit

Delores Taylor died in 2018 NOT 2013. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2604:6000:E48B:B600:70BB:C242:2E5D:AF9A (talk) 11:37, 28 August 2019 (UTC)Reply