Talk:Tomasz Kuszłejko
(Redirected from Talk:Tomas Kušleika)
Latest comment: 2 years ago by Rotideypoc41352 in topic Requested move 27 June 2022
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article was edited to contain a total or partial translation of Tomas Egidijus Kušleika from the Lithuanian Wikipedia. Consult the history of the original page to see a list of its authors. |
![]() | On 27 June 2022, it was proposed that this article be moved from Tomas Kušleika to Tomasz Kuszłejko. The result of the discussion was moved. |
Requested move 27 June 2022
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. 21:36, 14 July 2022 (UTC) by Mellohi!. Courtesy close as rmCloser may have experienced yet another bug. (non-admin closure) Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 02:26, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
Tomas Kušleika → Tomasz Kuszłejko – Similar situation to Talk:Romuald Giedroyć#Requested move 5 April 2022, Polish-Lithuanian figure of January Uprising, from the Polish-speaking family. Tomasz Kuszłejko is the name used by contemporaries. Marcelus (talk) 13:52, 27 June 2022 (UTC)— Relisting. —usernamekiran (talk) 19:01, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
- Kuszłejko was a member of patriotic organisations in Paris, and published several leaflets signed by him as Kuszłejko or Kuszłeyko
- Tomasz Kuszłejko is the name used by Agaton Giller in his Historja powstania narodu polskiego w 1861-1864]
- his obituary from 1894 with the name Egidjusz Tomasz Kuszłejko
- Oppose. Tomas Kušleika was from ethnically Lithuanian lands and his dedication to Lithuania is unquestionable based on his actions.--Cukrakalnis (talk) 13:34, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
- Support. Evidence that he signed his name in Polish is more relevant than someones opinion that he was a Lithuanian patriot, and would prefer to sign his name in a way that did not become popular until few decades later. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 16:14, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
- Support per nomination and Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus. Subject is claimed by both neighboring countries which were once joined as Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth but, in the case at hand, evidence does indeed point to this member of the noble family considering himself ethnically Polish. —Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 01:10, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.