Talk:Top (character)

Moving to The Top (comics)

I'd like to move this to The Top (Comics), reversing the redirect currently in place. Any objections to putting the main article at the proper page for his moniker?ThuranX 01:08, 1 March 2006 (UTC)

I would disagree per naming conventions. The Top may be the proper name, but he's almost always referred to as "Top" when in speech.--Toffile 01:38, 1 March 2006 (UTC)

I'd normally concede the point, but whereas the convention among writers in Batman comic books is to refer to the villian as 'Joker' not 'The Joker', as per the naming conventions page, Roscoe Dillon is regularly called by characters either 'The Top', or 'Dillon', but not 'Top'. Multiple Flashes have stated they need to stop 'The Top', while Batman calls The Joker 'Joker'. Even in Flash comics, Trickster is officially 'The Trickster', but is called 'Trickster'. I submit that this is a significant case of use of 'The' as a major part of the character's name, not a lacking indefinite article situation, more akin to 'The Band', wherein the noun is so generic without the 'The' that it loses all identity.ThuranX 18:20, 1 March 2006 (UTC)

I can think of a few cases off the top of my head where Dillon has been called "Top" in speech. The special where Superman raced Jay Garrick, Abra Kadabra addresses him as it, as well as Captain Cold talking to him during Rogue's War. I'd go see if I could find some more, but he's had only a handful of appearances in the Modern Age. --Toffile 14:40, 2 March 2006 (UTC)

Snart uses it derisively, as for a Superman special racing Garrick, I'm not sure how to weight non-Flash writing against Flash writing, or if weighting it's reasonable. Anyways, this is, ultimately, a minor thing, so I'm not going to push this further. I'm good with it staying here. Now on to other Flash related things... <goes off looking for that obnoxious bit with the speedsters of every century, looking to make Wiki's most geek-oriented Flash page ever...> Thanks for the talk about it. ThuranX 01:21, 3 March 2006 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Flash216.PNG

Image:Flash216.PNG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 04:13, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Flash222.PNG

Image:Flash222.PNG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 04:13, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

The Batman

I think whoever added the bit about Top being in that episode of The Batman is mistaken. The game show host's name was Ross Darren, not Roscoe Dillon, and his spinning stunt was something any normal person could do, not like Top's superspeed spinning. I think it should be removed. LiaBrown (talk) 13:30, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

Turbine

Turbine isn't a former Rogue this chronologically impossible since he was trapped in the speed force for 70 years, additionally he was not recruited by them on the present and his appearance in Flash Annual (Volume 4) #1 is as supporting or rather neutral character. Steve Sexton II (talk) 23:00, 14 November 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Top (comics). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060323061226/http://www.monitorduty.com/mdarchives/2005/12/alan_kistlers_p_3.shtml to http://www.monitorduty.com/mdarchives/2005/12/alan_kistlers_p_3.shtml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:10, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

{{subst:requested move|Top (character)|reason=does not follow Wikipedia's naming conventions.}} NeoBatfreak (talk) 19:05, 20 July 2023 (UTC)

{{subst:requested move|Top (character)|reason=per naming convention.}} NeoBatfreak (talk) 19:06, 20 July 2023 (UTC)

Requested move 29 December 2023

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. to Top (character). (closed by non-admin page mover) Bensci54 (talk) 21:05, 5 January 2024 (UTC)

---

Top (comics) → Top (DC Comics) – Proper naming. NeoBatfreak (talk) 20:41, 29 December 2023 (UTC)

• Move to Top (character), per WP:NCCDAB. 162 etc. (talk) 21:20, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
• Support per nom There are many characters called "Top" because it is the nickname for ranks, the ranks are listed at Top (disambiguation). So this would engender confusion with people looking up information on some character referred to as "Top" which isn't specific personal name but a rank, so they would then necessarily look up why the character is called Top is due to rank, and the rank page is what they want. -- 65.92.247.66 (talk) 07:55, 5 January 2024 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.