Talk:Outline of transhumanism
This article was nominated for deletion on 17 October 2021. The result of the discussion was redirect. |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Outline of transhumanism redirect. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
IMPORTANT: Friendly advice for new contributors
editWikipedia is not a soapbox, a battleground, or a vehicle for propaganda and advertising. This applies to the Transhumanism-related articles, categories, templates, and talk page discussions. Therefore, all content hosted in Wikipedia cannot be:
- Propaganda, advocacy, or recruitment of any kind, commercial, political, religious, or otherwise. Of course, an article can report objectively about such things, as long as an attempt is made to describe the topic from a neutral point of view. You might wish to start a transhumanist blog or visit a transhumanist forum if you want to convince people of the merits of your favorite transhumanist views.
- Opinion pieces on current affairs or politics. Although current affairs and politics, especially those that advance or hinder the goals of the transhumanist movement, may stir passions and tempt people to "climb soapboxes" (i.e. passionately advocate their pet point of view), Wikipedia is not the medium for this. Articles must be balanced so as to put entries, especially for current affairs, in a reasonable perspective, and represent a neutral point of view. Furthermore, Wikipedia authors should strive to write articles that will not quickly become obsolete. Wikinews, however, allows commentaries on its articles.
- Self-promotion. It can be tempting to write about yourself or transhumanist projects you have a strong personal involvement in. However, do remember that the standards for encyclopedic articles apply to such pages just like any other, including the requirement to maintain a neutral point of view, which is difficult when writing about yourself. Creating overly abundant links and references to autobiographical articles is unacceptable. See Wikipedia:Autobiography, Wikipedia:Notability and Wikipedia:Conflict of interest.
- Advertising. Articles about companies and products are written in an objective and unbiased style. Article topics must be third-party verifiable, so articles about very small "garage" or local companies are typically unacceptable. External links to commercial organizations are acceptable if they identify major organizations associated with a topic. Wikipedia neither endorses organizations nor runs affiliate programs. See also Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies) for guidelines on corporate notability. Those promoting transhumanist causes or events, or issuing public service announcements, even if noncommercial, should use a forum other than Wikipedia to do so.
Transhumanism portal
editThere's certainly enough here to build one! Nk.sheridan Talk 15:55, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
Rename proposal for this page and all the pages of the set this page belongs to
editSee the proposal at the Village pump
Guidelines for outlines
editGuidelines for the development of outlines are being drafted at Wikipedia:Outlines.
Your input and feedback is welcomed and encouraged.
The "History of" section needs links!
editPlease add some relevant links to the history section.
Links can be found in the "History of" article for this subject, in the "History of" category for this subject, or in the corresponding navigation templates. Or you could search for topics on Google - most topics turn blue when added to Wikipedia as internal links.
Sections
editIt seems to me this article is a collection of concepts instead of providing an encyclopaedic view of transhumanism. It is in grave need of rewriting. FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 15:51, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
Broken refs
editThere were two broken refs on the page, producing the big red error text in the reflist. I commented them both out. Presumably the main references here were deleted leaving only these orphaned refs.
- <ref name="Intelligent agents"/>
- <ref name="Coining of the term AI"/>
I guess the task here is comb through the history, find what the real references were, and then update these to include the full citation? Gosh that sound annoying, this seems like a real problem with named refs -- when removing any named ref you have to search for ophans, if not you leave a mess for someone else. Silas Ropac (talk) 21:10, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
- These were never working references which became orphaned. Instead the wikitext was copied from the lead for Artificial intelligence and the references become broken at that time. So the task is just to fix up the references to make them like the lead. Although this kind of raises the question does a lead copied into an outline need the exact same citations, or are the requirements more lenient because one can always go to the main article and see the full details? Silas Ropac (talk) 20:22, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
Quick explanation of Wikipedia outlines
edit"Outline" is short for "hierarchical outline". There are two types of outlines: sentence outlines (like those you made in school to plan a paper), and topic outlines (like the topical synopses that professors hand out at the beginning of a college course). Outlines on Wikipedia are primarily topic outlines that serve 2 main purposes: they provide taxonomical classification of subjects showing what topics belong to a subject and how they are related to each other (via their placement in the tree structure), and as subject-based tables of contents linked to topics in the encyclopedia. The hierarchy is maintained through the use of heading levels and indented bullets. See Wikipedia:Outlines for a more in-depth explanation. The Transhumanist 00:12, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
This article is way too long
editThis is why I started the https://hpluspedia.org project - this article is way too ambitious by itself. Deku-shrub (talk) 21:53, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
Archived at the Wayback Machine
editCopies of the outline can now be found at the Internet Archive. — The Transhumanist 07:10, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
Archive of rendered page, 2024 May 09
edithttps://web.archive.org/web/20240509064923/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Outline_of_transhumanism
Archive of edit page, 2024 May 09
editThe wiki source text for Outline of transhumanism can be seen at: