Talk:Trial of Kenneth Lay and Jeffrey Skilling
| While the biographies of living persons policy does not apply directly to the subject of this article, it may contain material that relates to living persons, such as friends and family of persons no longer living, or living persons involved in the subject matter. Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons must be removed immediately. If such material is re-inserted repeatedly, or if there are other concerns related to this policy, please see this noticeboard. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Needs a Summary
editI came here for a refresher on what exactly the counts were, and find instead chicken-scratch notes listing merely who testified and what the general topic was (but not what they said.) Can we have a primer up top saying basically what Kenneth Lay and Jeffrey Skilling were accused of? Something a little more than descriptive "securities fraud" but less than the full legal jargon. Anyone want to be bold and write one? --Mrcolj 23:16, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
=Inconsistent
editIt says on this page that Skilling was convicted of 19 of 28 counts of fraud. However on the Jeffery Skilling page it says that he had 35 counts.... which one is correct? I'm inclined to take both of them down unless someone adds a citation. speedplane
This can't be the correct Ken Rice
editThe Ken Rice in the Witnesses section is a TV anchor in Pennsylvania. I don't believe this is the same guy who was CEO of Enron Broadband, who was a witness for the government. Pegburke4 21:14, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
- I'd also bet that you are correct -- that it's a different Ken Rice. (So, it needs a DAB of sorts . . . ) -- Sholom 15:44, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for File:Skilling enron.jpg
edit
File:Skilling enron.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
