Talk:Tetragonula hockingsi

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 25 October 2015 by reviewer Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs).

Insects: Hymenoptera Low‑importance

	Insects portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Insects, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of insects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InsectsWikipedia:WikiProject InsectsTemplate:WikiProject InsectsInsects articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Hymenoptera task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Australia: Queensland / Biota Low‑importance

	Australia portal Tetragonula hockingsi is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Queensland (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian biota (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Queensland.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Feedback

Your article was very informative and extremely well written. I made a few grammatical edits but didn't see any typos. The major suggestions I have for your article concern its content. If the name of the species of bee is Tetragonula hockingsi, why is the title of the page Trigona hockingsi? I would include more interesting facts in your Taxonomy and Phylogeny section if you can. Under Worker Queen Conflict, I would either define or hyperlink monogyny and monandry, those are not common knowledge, however predators is a common term, probably doesn't need a hyperlink. I would also define generalist feeder, it is unclear what that means. Additionally, how do the bees eject their rivals? You should go into more detail or define the term! My only other suggestion is concerning citations. It seems that you are missing a lot of citations and in some places using incorrect citation form (Michener). Every fact should have a footnoted citation. Overall great work!

Comments

First, a lot of the citations were not correct for Wikipedia. I would suggest going through and fixing all of the citations that are incorrect. While some things are cited correctly, others were not and make the article more difficult to read. Further, there were some sections, such as the foraging patterns section, that had very few citations. I would suggest adding more citations to sections like this where there are several sentences in a row without citations. There are also many links that link to nonexistent pages, which should also be changed. Further, I made a few editions to make the entry easier to read by deleting words and changing the order of words to make the entry flow better. However, I did find that overall the content of the article was good and covered a great deal of information well. If you made these edits, I think that the page would be great!

Peer Review

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This article provides a lot of great information and seems very well researched. I was a bit confused with the name of the page being 'Tirgona hockingsi", as in the overview it is mentioned that this is what the species was previously known as. Thus, I think the name of the page should be changed to 'Tetragonula hockingsi'. I thought the layout and organization of the page was really good and all the information flowed nicely. The POP process discussed in the colony cycle section was very fascinating. I also found the fatal fighting section to be of great interest. I noticed there were a few hyperlinks that linked to nonexistent pages, so I think this issue should be addressed. Additionally, I think the page would benefit from more subsections under the 'Behavior" heading. Specifically, sections on mating behavior and communication of the species. Overall, this is a great entry. Nice work!Khan.nadia (talk) 04:45, 23 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Add topic