Talk:Bispectrum

Statistics Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Statistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of statistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.StatisticsWikipedia:WikiProject StatisticsTemplate:WikiProject StatisticsStatistics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Mathematics Mid‑priority

	Mathematics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mathematics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MathematicsWikipedia:WikiProject MathematicsTemplate:WikiProject Mathematicsmathematics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-priority on the project's priority scale.

Poor definition

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I'm not sure what the bispectrum is, but the explanation here is poorly written.

1. It is defined here in terms of cumulants, itself a concept whose WP article doesn't promise clarity. (If I were interested in cumulants, perhaps it would be more useful, I can't say. But that's not my current interest.)

2. If I understand correctly, the bispectrum of 2 signals (f,g) is, precisely, cov(f+g,f*g), where "*" = convolution and "cov" = covariance (i.e., correlation x product of standard deviations). Is this true? If so, it would be much more helpful to define it that way before explaining its relation to cumulants and its computation by Fourier transform.

It would be especially helpful to explain the underlying intuition, i.e., how it encodes information that, say, EEG analysts have found to be meaningful, or why one might turn to bispectra when studying certain kinds of related signals. Jmacwiki (talk) 20:43, 2 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Add topic