Talk:Tunica-Biloxi

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Native Americans, Indigenous peoples in Canada, and related indigenous peoples of North America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indigenous peoples of North AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaTemplate:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaIndigenous peoples of North America articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

United States: Louisiana Mid‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Louisiana portal This article is supported by WikiProject Louisiana (assessed as Mid-importance).

Emphasize modern tribe

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

In order to keep the articles straight, I think this should focus on the Tunica-Biloxi Tribe and its "20th c. to present" history, rather than repeating all the history that was in the History of Tunica people article. Keep the lengthy and general historical description in that other article , but rename/move it to "Tunica (people)". That type of treatment is what was done for Cherokee and some others.--Parkwells (talk) 00:14, 27 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Name

Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I changed the name of the tribe in the article to "Tunica-Biloxi Tribe of Louisiana", and the name of the reservation to "Tunica-Biloxi Reservation" with this edit, stating "Name of tribe and reservation per primary and other RS". I did this because the tribe's own website, their flag, other related primary sources ([1][2]), and other recent reliable sources (The Smithsonian, State of LA SR 109, One Feather obit, Hoover's corp profile, Indianz.com, Avoyelles local news) use that name.

With this edit, Uyvsdi reverted me, stating "please see List of federally recognized tribes, the name of the tribe is: Tunica-Biloxi Indian Tribe". The source of that article is the BIA's publication of "Indian Entities Recognized and Eligible To Receive Services From the United States Bureau of Indian Affairs" in the Federal Register.

The article itself, inexplicably, is named Tunica-Biloxi.

There seems to be no doubt that the three names refer to the same people and tribe. Why should the BIA (an agency with an, at best, spotty history with regard to human rights) exonym for a particular people over-rule their own naming preference (as reported by other reliable sources)? I'll bet that an audit of the BIA list against the WP list and articles will show many more discrepancies, with similar evidence against use of the BIA names. I don't mind mentioning the BIA name in the article for reference, but to ignore a people's own right to choose the name by which they should be called seems wrong. It took the tribe until 1981 to gain recognition from the BIA – it doesn't surprise me at all that, when they chose to change their name at some time since then (or the BIA just got it wrong), the tribe wouldn't "rock the boat" by trying to get it changed at the BIA.

Comments? —[AlanM1(talk)]— 17:35, 2 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

The BIA doesn't choose tribes' names for them; the tribe chooses its own name. As I pointed out in my edit, the tribe was previously named the Tunica-Biloxi Indian Tribe of Louisiana. They have very recently changed their own name, which they have a right to do, to Tunica-Biloxi Indian Tribe. Since the name change is recent, most web hits will have the previous name. Many tribes are removing states' names from their tribal names, to remove any implication that the state has sovereignty over the tribe. -Uyvsdi (talk) 16:54, 3 August 2013 (UTC)UyvsdiReply

External links modified

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 10 external links on Tunica-Biloxi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:10, 24 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic