Talk:Max Lange Attack
(Redirected from Talk:Two Knights Defense, Max Lange Attack)
Latest comment: 1 year ago by MaterialWorks in topic Requested move 20 April 2023
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
On 20 April 2023, it was proposed that this article be moved to Italian Game, Max Lange Attack. The result of the discussion was moved to Max Lange Attack. |
Requested move 20 April 2023
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved to Max Lange Attack. (closed by non-admin page mover) – MaterialWorks 17:54, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
Two Knights Defense, Max Lange Attack → Italian Game, Max Lange Attack – This can also arise from the following move order: 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc5 4.O-O Nf6 5.d4!? exd4 6.e5! (Giuoco Piano) Italian Game includes both, while Two Knights Defence is a very specific order of moves. Jishiboka1 (talk) 05:03, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
- The "Two Knights Defence is a very specific order of moves." The same can be said of the Italian Game. --IHTS (talk) 06:07, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
- Personally, I think the right article name is simply Max Lange Attack, considering the number of plausible move orders to reach this position. Double sharp (talk) 13:13, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
- Move to Max Lange Attack. There's also a number of articles in Category:Chess openings that can likely be moved to more concise titles. 162 etc. (talk) 14:15, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
- Support alternate move to Max Lange Attack. Skarmory (talk • contribs) 07:50, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.