Talk:Two Pieces of Nuts

(Redirected from Talk:Two Pieces of Nuts (Hungarian folktale))
Latest comment: 2 years ago by SL93 in topic Did you know nomination

Did you know nomination

edit
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk20:15, 1 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Created by User:KHR FolkMyth and nominated by Evrik at 04:39, 6 April 2022 (UTC).Reply

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems

Hook eligibility:

  • Cited:   - Offline/paywalled citation accepted in good faith
  • Interesting:  
  • Other problems:   - WP:DYKSG#C6
QPQ: Done.

Overall:   Nothing on Earwig's. AGF on foreign language source. Fascinating folklore. The image is free, consider adding the image too. Venkat TL (talk) 16:35, 14 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

  • I think that the words Hungarian folktale tie it to the real world, but here is an alternate:
  • Alt1 "... that the Hungarian folktale Two Pieces of Nuts, is similar to other folktales that feature endangered children who return to tell their story.

--evrik (talk) 03:00, 18 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

How about going super obscure, like one of these?

The only other thing that comes to mind would be a hook about the ATU classification, but that feels like a reach. ezlev (user/tlk/ctrbs) 04:33, 26 April 2022 (UTC)Reply
  • I think my main concern with both hooks is that neither hook makes sense unless you're familiar with the geography of Hungary, which I imagine would be most of our readership. With that said, I can at least understand the opinion of "it's vague on purpose since it could tempt people to read more", so I will bow to consensus on this one. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 01:42, 27 April 2022 (UTC)Reply
  • I also think that the second suggestion is misleading because the article uses the term "collected" rather than "found". I think the second suggestion would be a better option than the first if "found" was changed to "collected". Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 01:44, 27 April 2022 (UTC)Reply
--evrik (talk) 15:24, 27 April 2022 (UTC)Reply