Talk:U.S. Route 66

(Redirected from Talk:U.S. Highway 66)
Latest comment: 4 months ago by 2003:C6:3742:EE20:BD80:5BE5:2D8A:6BEC in topic Why is the route description section in reverse?
Former good articleU.S. Route 66 was one of the Engineering and technology good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 18, 2005Peer reviewReviewed
September 25, 2005Featured article candidateNot promoted
March 25, 2006Good article nomineeListed
July 23, 2007Good article reassessmentDelisted
June 21, 2020Good article nomineeNot listed
Current status: Delisted good article

Why is the route description section in reverse?

edit

Because Route 66 is famous for one thing, westward migration? Why is the section on Route description listed in reverse? 146.200.202.126 (talk) 14:54, 16 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Short answer: milepost 0 was at the western terminus in Santa Monica and with a few exceptions all US Road articles are written according to direction the mileposts progress. Dave (talk) 16:58, 16 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
Does the song have to be sung in reverse, too? "It leads from LA to Chicago, because Wikipedia says so"? In Easy Rider, they travelled eastward, but that is probably the only example of anybody going in that direction on Route 66, which is a tourist destination, and not a US Road anymore. 2003:C6:3742:EE20:BD80:5BE5:2D8A:6BEC (talk) 18:15, 13 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Google Doodle of 30 April 2022

edit

The Google Doodle is available on YouTube.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZoPJVcHYlU0 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:23C7:3195:AC00:90EB:D9EB:77FC:34C8 (talk) 09:45, 30 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

That's an awful lot of AKAs in the first sentence

edit

Rather than embed every known or obscure or downright invented affectionate nickname and alternate designation in a parenthetical in the first sentence, it'd be nice if a standard emerged for moving AKA to their own infobox section or paragraph. The first sentence of every article of this kind is always rendered unreadable by a horde of AKA contributions. — Preceding unsigned comment added by P.T.isfirst (talkcontribs) 22:01, 8 June 2022 (UTC)Reply