Talk:NASCAR Cup Series at New Hampshire
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the NASCAR Cup Series at New Hampshire article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
The contents of the ISM Connect 300 page were merged into NASCAR Cup Series at New Hampshire. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
Requested move
edit- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: No consensus – Nascar1996 (talk • cont) 21:12, 1 July 2013 (UTC) (non-admin closure)
Lenox Industrial Tools 301 → New Hampshire 300 – New name of race. Dough4872 00:35, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose. Well, right now anyway. I saw that the race is supposed to be getting a sponsor before the race, but if it still doesn't have a sponsor by Wednesday of that week, then I would support the move. If they would get a sponsor this move would have been unnecessary, and on the track's website it says "While the name might be changed, the New Hampshire 301 will still go the extra mile, as has become tradition in July." Would it need to be moved to New Hampshire 301? – Nascar1996 (talk • cont) 01:21, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
- The site here appears to contradict itself. The logo says 300 while the description says 301. Guess we will have to wait and see. But Lenox Industrial Tools 301 is not an appropriate title since they are no longer sponsoring the race. Dough4872 01:30, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
- Agreed, but we don't even know what the race name is. Is it 300, 301, or will they find a sponsor? – Nascar1996 (talk • cont) 01:32, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
- The site here appears to contradict itself. The logo says 300 while the description says 301. Guess we will have to wait and see. But Lenox Industrial Tools 301 is not an appropriate title since they are no longer sponsoring the race. Dough4872 01:30, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
- As I previously noted, the name of the race is now Camping World RV Sales 301. I see no reason to wait now. – Nascar1996 (talk • cont) 21:05, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
External links modified (February 2018)
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on New Hampshire 301. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090223185252/http://the506.com/yabb/YaBB.pl?num=1232064927 to http://the506.com/yabb/YaBB.pl?num=1232064927
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:26, 17 February 2018 (UTC)