This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Shipwrecks, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of shipwreck-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ShipwrecksWikipedia:WikiProject ShipwrecksTemplate:WikiProject ShipwrecksShipwreck articles
Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Please note that the statement that all aboard were lost is not correct. The commanding officer, two other officers, and three enlisted men were swept from the bridge as the boat sank and were rescued. Sources, among others, include U.S. Naval Submarine School, "Submarine Casualties Booklet" (New London, Connecticut, 1966), page A-27. Keacla1 (talk) 15:59, 30 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Could someone with knowledge of the subject reconcile the contradictory crew numbers? The right-side info box states that each R-class submarine features a “complement [of] 33 officers and men”, yet the “Accident and loss” section describes an R-12 crew of 47, of which 5 survived and 42 were lost. Both (conflicting) numbers, with additional details of each, are found on the source page here, so resolving this question is not simply a matter of checking the cited sources. 50.181.30.121 (talk) 17:57, 25 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
.jpg)
