Talk:Ufa train disaster

Trains Start‑class Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Start

This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Soviet Union Low‑importance

	Soviet Union portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Soviet Union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Soviet UnionWikipedia:WikiProject Soviet UnionTemplate:WikiProject Soviet UnionSoviet Union articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Russia Low‑importance

	Russia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Disaster management Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Occupational Safety and Health Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Occupational Safety and Health, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to occupational safety and health on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Occupational Safety and HealthWikipedia:WikiProject Occupational Safety and HealthTemplate:WikiProject Occupational Safety and HealthOccupational Safety and Health articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:

[1] Section of book discussing disaster.

Facts are needed

Latest comment: 13 years ago8 comments3 people in discussion

This article sais "The explosion was so powerful it blew out windows in Asha, eight miles (13 km) away.[3] The explosion is said to have been equal to 10 kilotons of TNT,"

Where is the reference to point that fact. the references in the article do not support this argument

Thx

Fttxguru (talk) 18:04, 24 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Ten kilotons. Hiroshima. Was not just felt, but blew out windows 13km away. This sounds quite a bit over the top, and should be removed, since the Times article does not use these figures. I have removed this material pending some sources. Herostratus (talk) 19:43, 24 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

I think I found the source for my question

Here it is

http://www.energy-daily.com/reports/Analysis_Gazprom_explosion_in_Moscow_999.html

Fttxguru (talk) 19:58, 24 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hmmmm, well. Some questions about that.

I assume that Energy Daily is probably a more or less reliable source, generally, within their area of expertise. They are probably not a necessarily a good source for historical facts, though. The source you gave is a 2009 article which mentions (in passing - its not the main thrust of the article) something that happened twenty years ago. In the Soviet Union, which was not the easiest place to get hard facts from.
They say "estimated to be equivalent to 10 kilotons of TNT, two-thirds as powerful as the Hiroshima explosion". Estimated by whom?

I dunno. I wonder if the 10kt figure was something someone somewhere said as a guestimate, and it got passed around, and Energy Daily picked it up. I'd like to see an actual report or something that cites an actual report before I put it back in the article. But I'm a bit of a stickler, so it's arguable that your citation is OK. (There's nothing about the 13km window breaking, though). Herostratus (talk) 04:18, 25 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hmmm, the Soviet source deadlinks, which leaves us with the American sources, which 1) gives casualty totals a lot lower than 1,200 and 2) indicates tat the casualties were basically all on the trains - and not even all the passengers died, which doesn't seem to jibe with an atomic-bomb level explosion. We need to get some proper Russian sources in this article. Herostratus (talk) 04:29, 25 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

This source: (MediaKorSet) says that the Soviet military estimated the blast at 20 megatons (мегатонн), which is obviously a misprint (the Tsar Bomba itself was only 50 megatons). But then it goes on to say "about half the size of Hiroshima" so even if they meant 20 kilotons that's wrong, as Hiroshima was about 13 kilotons. So I dunno. I can't really take that source as reliable.

Then you have this source, which says that according to "unofficial" data, the explosion was "about the same as in Hiroshima - about 12 kilotons".

So hmmmm. It was a big bang, there's no doubt about that. How big I don't feel confident in saying at this point. The Russian Wikipedia article here has a plethora of sources (all in Russian of course) so maybe this can be teased out - or perhaps not. Herostratus (talk) 04:59, 25 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

There's a working source in English here. I added some material from it, but you may want to rewrite what I wrote because it's a bit clumsy. Nanobear (talk) 22:18, 25 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

No, fine. I added links from the Russian Wikipedia article, and while I blew through them rather quickly I noted that the BBC and one other source (forget which one) talked about hundreds of tons of TNT equivalent. Someday maybe I'll go through the sources and expand the article. Herostratus (talk) 04:51, 31 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Coordinate error

Latest comment: 12 years ago4 comments4 people in discussion

{{geodata-check}}

The following coordinate fixes are needed for

the accident was of liquefied petroleum gas not liquefied natural gas

—62.190.10.139 (talk) 09:16, 17 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

What is "liquefied petroleum gas"? Petroleum is a liquid, so ""liquefied petroleum" is redundant. If you convert petroleum to gas and they re-liquify it, you just have petroleum again I suppose rather than "liquefied petroleum gas". The ref just says "liquified gas". IIRC There was another ref somewhere that said "liquefied petroleum gas" but I assumed that that was just translation glitch? Herostratus (talk) 16:18, 17 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Liquid Petroleum gas, aka LP is commonly known as Natural Gas to the lay public in the US. It IS common today to liquify the gas through refrigeration for easier transportation. Remove the pressure, it reverts to a gaseous state for consumer and industrial use.Wzrd1 (talk) 00:35, 8 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Geodata-check request declined — Not a coordinates issue, coordinates appear to be correct. — TransporterMan (TALK) 18:00, 22 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Ufa train wreck. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:33, 4 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

107233846 ufatrainaccident1.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 12:52, 10 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Add topic