Talk:Thalerhof internment camp

Untitled

I admit that Talerhof has never been part of Poland, however defined, but its prisoners came from an area that later became part of Poland, and it was an influence on post WW I Polish history. Feel free to add any discussion.Pustelnik 21:13, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

Charles I

It is not clear to me what his role is is Talerhof. Did he actively fight for its closure, or did he just ignore it, and it was closed during his short reign? Unless he put in an effort to close it, I don't see how he deserves the title "Blessed". Pustelnik (talk) 12:32, 28 September 2008 (UTC)

Hmmm

I am confused in situation, when modern Russians trying to show Thalerhof as a part of "Russian" (not Ruthenian, Ukrainian or Rusyns/Lemkos) history. Not only Russian, but also Orthodox, in time, when a lot (maybe even biggest part) of victims were Greek-Catholics. Now this history more and more stopping to have connections with Lemkos tragedy, but helps Russians in theirs against-West propaganda, and in theirs thesis about "permanent presence" of Russians (not Ruthenians!) in Galicia. I am full of sorrow... Gerea-en (talk) 13:33, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

I agree, the article is misleading, as it states uncertain data as a fact. The Ukrainian page states the facts that Talerhof had 85% of Ukrainians, which contradicts the statement that "Captives who identified themselves as Ukrainians were freed from the camp." --Internetyev (talk) 23:59, 8 January 2024 (UTC)

Article Name

Let's name the article after the correct name of the place: Thalerhof – not Talerhof. And make appropriate corrections in the text.

46.211.97.110 (talk) 21:50, 16 December 2014 (UTC)Rev.Volodymyr

According to WP:COMMONNAME, both versions are supported (fairly much on par). If anything, the inclination has risen towards Talerhof again more recently (per Google ngram) in relation its function as an interment camp. --Iryna Harpy (talk) 05:19, 17 December 2014 (UTC)