Talk:Ulla Jones

2008 & 2009 comments

I am Ulla Andersson/Jones- nowdays :Andesong. I don't want to conceal the true story, since this one of me is a lie. Please change it.

Quincy and I did not split up because of his touring or my growing alcoholism or substance abuse problem. I did NOT receive a huge sum of money that was stolen from me by abusive men. I received a one- sum deal of 50 000 dollars and 1800 dollars a month for 5 years....that was the divorcedeal. and I aprooved it, I did not take him to court. It was Peggy who wanted to marry Quincy while he was still in COMA. And when he woke up he called me and asked me to sign the divorcepapers (for the first time) and send them back express, I DID!

The reasons for my substanceabuse, exept for those times when everybody smoked grass, is that I had an undiagnozed serious illness that noone believed for 23 years. I had one foot in the grave when one doctor figured it out. I now have almost 19 years stone sober! So I wonder WHY am I the ONLY one in that big extended family being called an addict! When I'm the only one, that I know, that has cleaned up!- Please respect me! I am seriously tired of this dumb blond irresponsible image, that is not me! I am otherwise very much at peace with my life. You can find me on :Myspace.com/ullaandesong. Thank you Ulla 01:45, 12 September 2008 from 80.216.14.234

Comment of 21:36, 9 June 2009 by 80.216.95.129 (4,288 bytes) moved today from article page by SoCoColl (talk) 17:04, 14 June 2009 (UTC): I am Ulla Andesong- and i want you please to edit the fact that my marriage to Q. ended because of my growing addiction- or to his touring- none of it is the reason for why we split- I had problems with an undiagnozed immunedefficiancy deffect later- and smoked grass and drank beer- but I was never a fall down addict-I was amd am less of an addict than Q. has ever been so please get the facts straight. I have 20 years clean- and quincy toured Once- and that time I came along-

Removed various statements which 1) weren't properly referenced with WP:RS, 2) would have been highly questionable from a WP:BLP point of view even if they were. Tomas e (talk) 15:29, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

Deletion request

An IP user put a template on the article for deletion but wrote nothing here. I am removing the template which clearly states that an IP must use this talk page in such cases. SergeWoodzing (talk) 10:15, 24 April 2011 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

• Ulla Andesong in 2018.jpg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 14:23, 19 March 2023 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

• Ulla Jones sings onstage.jpg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 18:08, 22 March 2023 (UTC)

Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for speedy deletion:

• Model Ulla Andersson.jpg
• Ulla Andesong Glamour Magazine cover.jpg
• Ulla Andesong Seventeen Magazine Cover.jpg
• Ulla Jones and an unidentified model.jpg

You can see the reasons for deletion at the file description pages linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 18:23, 22 March 2023 (UTC)

Acceptable sourcing?

Much of this article, such as divorce settlement details, is based on info the subject has given herself in an autobiography, too much. I will be removing most or all of it unless someone can convince me not to. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 19:23, 22 March 2023 (UTC)

BLPN archived discussion[1] Morbidthoughts (talk) 02:40, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

To address the concerns, couldn't you help improve the article by suggesting specific areas for enhancement or providing alternative sources? Collaborating on improvements would be more constructive than repeatedly threatening it with deletion.

The subject obviously warrants at least a stub. (You could also try trimming the entry.) ash (talk) 03:38, 12 February 2024 (UTC)