Talk:California's 51st congressional district

Empty

edit

Thank you for hopping on this so quickly. However, I'd like to retain this article, like the 500+ articles which will be created, over time, to describe the 435 current U.S. Congressional Districts, the several districts for non-voting delegates, and the dozens of obsolete, though historically important. --Mark_Adler (t·c) 01:59, 30 November 2005 (UTC)Reply

Gerrymandering

edit

Why is there no information here regarding the population make up of this district? It was mapped out specificially to have an over 55+% Democrat affiliation of its registered voters. Furthermore, there is not a single paved road that one can remain on, and remain for the entire distance of that road, within this districts boundries.

This edit was done back in 2006, before we had the sine bot. To answer the question, since the above comment was placed, California now has draws its congressional district lines to make gerrymandering difficult, if not impossible. Samboy (talk) 20:20, 6 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

Expand

edit

This page does not have 2008 results. yoman82 (talk) 03:46, 5 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on California's 51st congressional district. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:12, 13 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on California's 51st congressional district. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:19, 29 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on California's 51st congressional district. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:47, 17 September 2017 (UTC)Reply