Talk:1914 United States Senate elections

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

United States: Government Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. Government (assessed as Low-importance).

U.S. Congress Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is about one (or many) event(s).

External links modified

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on United States Senate elections, 1914. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20021031080017/http://www.senate.gov/ to http://www.senate.gov/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:57, 21 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 7 February 2018

Latest comment: 6 years ago11 comments6 people in discussion

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: everything moved. Artix Kreiger (talk) 23:18, 8 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

– Per the consensus reached at the recent move discussion at United States Senate elections, 2016. 2601:241:300:C930:6003:7363:144A:2C5C (talk) 21:43, 7 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Speedy support, articles should never have been moved from long-standing titles without an RM to begin with, consensus was overwhelming in previous RM to revert anyway. SnowFire (talk) 22:06, 7 February 2018 (UTC)Reply
Move all but to "Senate election" not "Senate elections" per WP:NC-GAL. Number 5 7 11:10, 8 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Disagree with this, though. Why do you think NC-GAL supports "election" for an overview article on multiple elections? Even if it did, that just means the guideline should be updated. It wasn't one election, it's 33-34 separate elections adjudicated under 33 different sets of rules, law, etc. States are sovereign and run elections in the US. SnowFire (talk) 15:26, 8 February 2018 (UTC)Reply
- These aren't articles on multiple elections though, they're articles on elections to a single body. EU members are sovereign but the election articles are still titled European Parliament election, 2014 etc. Number 5 7 16:12, 8 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

"They're articles on elections to a single body" - Okay, but so what? That isn't in contention, just that they are separate elections, hence the plural. I can't comment on the European case, but if nothing else, the common usage (ignoring questions of grammar) is to refer to "elections" in US news media, even if the elections are all to the same body. See: https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2018/us/elections/calendar-primary-results.html for an example. SnowFire (talk) 16:26, 8 February 2018 (UTC)Reply
- I'm just interested in having consistency of article titling across all countries and don't see why the US needs to be a special case (as unfortunately seems to be the case all too often on Wikipedia). And I would disagree with the claim that these are separate elections – it's a single election to a national legislature. Number 5 7 16:45, 8 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

It's not a single election. It's 33+ different elections, run by different governments, with different rules, all of which are summarized in this meta-article. As this meta-article is a summary, it should remain plural: "elections."—GoldRingChip 16:51, 8 February 2018 (UTC)Reply
- Again, I disagree with this interpretation. It's a regular election to a single body. But I'm not going to keep repeating this, so I'll bow out now and leave the closer to decide whose argument holds the most weight. Cheers, Number 5 7 16:57, 8 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Comment It seems that with the exception of United States Senate elections, 1940 and 1941, all the articles have already been moved to the requested name. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 147.126.81.6 (talk) 16:53, 8 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Add topic