Talk:Border security in the United States
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It is requested that an image or photograph of Border security in the United States be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible. Wikipedians in the United States may be able to help! The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
editThis article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Marceloe5665.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 12:02, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Article Cleanup
editThis article has multiple issues, and I've been working on cleaning it up over the weekend. I tackled the second part of the article, dealing with border security measures at ports, airports, and land borders. I cleaned up and clarified a lot of the language (i.e. changed 'United States southwestern' border to 'US-Mexico border'), added facts and connections between topics (especially in the airports section). While this article certainly reads like some type of essay, after close reading and editing I can see why the author thought this relevant to wikipedia, and (begrudgingly) agree that it should be here.
I will try my best to clean up this article and present more facts about the system surround the border security of the United States. If I get ambitious, I'll put in a section about the politics around border security and it's role in the immigration debate. Gee totes (talk) 17:01, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on United States border security concerns. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070427205030/http://www.tsa.gov/research/privacy/faqs.shtm to http://www.tsa.gov/research/privacy/faqs.shtm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120311010041/http://www.tsa.gov/approach/tech/ait/index.shtm to http://www.tsa.gov/approach/tech/ait/index.shtm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:05, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
article title
editI think the title Border security in the United States would be much more NPOV (omitting the loaded term "concerns") and precise/accurate (since the article covers more than just concerns, but also praxis, history, etc.). anyone have any thoughts before I request the move? Jdcooper (talk) 01:04, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support: The wikilink is piped in linked articles as none appear to use the "concerns" portion of the title. The shorter title better identifies the topic as you point out. The "solution" six years ago was to create a bunch of redirects such as the one you suggest moving on top of. Go for it! 〜 Adflatuss • talk 05:09, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
Requested move 23 January 2024
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) feminist🇭🇰🇺🇦 (talk) 14:59, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
United States border security concerns → Border security in the United States – This title would avoid NPOV language (specifically the loaded term "concerns"), be more precise/accurate (since the scope of the article is more than just "concerns", but also current situation, history, etc.), and be more consistent with similar articles across a whole range of topics ([Issue X] in [Jursidiction Y]. Jdcooper (talk) 13:53, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support per NPOV Orchastrattor (talk) 15:43, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
- Note: WikiProject United States has been notified of this discussion. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 16:09, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
- Note: WikiProject International relations has been notified of this discussion. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 16:09, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support, seems like a straightforwardly better title. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 17:22, 23 January 2024 (UTC)