Talk:2008 United States presidential election in South Dakota

Proposed deletion objection

edit

I have removed the proposed deletion notice, as I believe that it would be more appropriate, if deletion is desired, for an AfD to be held including all members of Category:2008 United States presidential election by state, rather than picking off single articles via PROD. DuncanHill (talk) 01:59, 20 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on United States presidential election in South Dakota, 2008. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 08:40, 26 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on United States presidential election in South Dakota, 2008. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:51, 21 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Internal conflicting statements

edit

It says "Prior to the election, all 17 news organizations considered this a state McCain would win, or otherwise considered as a red state.", but also that the Cook Political Report rated the state a toss-up. Which is true? Chris the speller yack 17:53, 23 February 2018 (UTC)Reply