Talk:Third-party and independent candidates for the 2012 United States presidential election

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on United States third party and independent presidential candidates, 2012. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:11, 21 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Post-election Results

edit

Now that the election is (long) over, it seems like the relevant ordering of candidates should be total votes, not ballot access. Redeemedmonkeycma (talk) 17:21, 25 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Move discussion in progress

edit

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:United States third party and independent presidential candidates, 2016 which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 14:31, 27 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 9 external links on United States third-party and independent presidential candidates, 2012. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:03, 4 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 11 June 2024

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Procedural close as moved. There was already a well-attended RM at Talk:Third party and independent candidates for the 2016 United States presidential election/Archive 2 which established that this should be hyphenated, and it also matches the guidelines, so I don't see a need for a full RM. The 2020 move away from the agreed title was undiscussed and should be reversed here.  — Amakuru (talk) 16:18, 11 June 2024 (UTC)Reply


– "Third party" is a compound modifier as it's used here, so should be "Third-party". The 1996 and 2008 articles have this format. A redirect is in the way in two of these cases, hence the RM. HandsomeFella (talk) 15:20, 11 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.