Talk:The Griffin Family History
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the The Griffin Family History article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
The Griffin Family History has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
GA Review
edit- This review is transcluded from Talk:Untitled Griffin Family History/GA3. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 15:12, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
This article is in decent shape, but it needs more work before it becomes a Good Article.
- Is it well written?
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
In the Plot, "...but was captured by a white Cleveland", "a white Cleveland"? In the Production section, "...this wasn't one imposed" ---> "...this was not one imposed", per here. Same section, "Hitler" ---> "Adolf Hitler", makes sense to have it like that.- Check.
- B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
Throughout the article, please link "Chris Sheridan" to its correspondence article, as at the moment it stands out as disambiguation. In the Cultural references section, "Hot for Teacher" needs quotation marks, as it is a song. Same section, the second repetition of "Singin' in the Rain" needs to be italicized if you're talking about the film.- Check.
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- Is it verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check?
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
In Reference 3 "The Dallas Morning News" needs to be italicized, since it's a newspaper. Ref. 14 is missing Publisher info.- Check.
- B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):
- C. It contains no original research:
- D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- Is it neutral?
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- Is it stable?
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
File:Panic Room (Family Guy).png needs a lower resolution.
- B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Not that much to do. If the statements above can be answered, I will pass the article. Good luck with improving this article!
- Pass or Fail:
-- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 15:12, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
- All done ThinkBlue, and Gage. CTJF83 chat 17:05, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
- Thank you to Ctjf for getting the stuff I left at the talk page, because I have gone off and placed the article as GA. Congrats. ;) -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 17:14, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
- Thank you for the review. CTJF83 chat 17:20, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
- Thank you to Ctjf for getting the stuff I left at the talk page, because I have gone off and placed the article as GA. Congrats. ;) -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 17:14, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
Reason for move
editOn the back cover of Family Guy: Volume Four Disc Three this episode is credited as "The Griffin Family History" not "Untitled Griffin Family History" and I found it very odd and confusing at the same time so I moved it to it's proper title as it's credited on the DVD and probably most commonly known by but if its to be moved back whatever I just thought the proper and credited title was better then some weird title. BringOurLovedOnesHome (talk) 11:04, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 2 external links on The Griffin Family History. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090502042229/http://www.film.com:80/tv/family-guy/season-5-2005/episode-18-untitled-griffin-family-history/14867306 to http://www.film.com/tv/family-guy/season-5-2005/episode-18-untitled-griffin-family-history/14867306
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080513022605/http://www.tvsquad.com:80/2006/05/14/family-guy-untitled-griffin-family-history/ to http://www.tvsquad.com/2006/05/14/family-guy-untitled-griffin-family-history/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 10:32, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on The Griffin Family History. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101006163358/http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/burbs/ to http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/burbs/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080509064413/http://annieawards.org/34thwinners.html to http://annieawards.org/34thwinners.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:03, 18 June 2017 (UTC)