Username

edit

I quote:

A username is a unique name for each user. User names are usually based on a short string of alphanumeric characters. Depending on the policies of the particular service, the name may be chosen by the user or assigned by a system administrator.

So is it "username" or "user name" (note the space)? If "username," then it should read, "A username is a unique name for each user. Usernames are usuall..." That is, the term should be consistently used.

--Lenehey 20:22, 26 October 2005 (UTC)Reply

I see it more often spelled as "username" (no space). Google suggest, "Did you mean: username?" Dictionary.com says "username" is also sometimes spelled "user name." And it should be added to the article that the word "screen name" is also used to refer to the same thing. --Dara 11:03, 27 October 2005 (UTC)Reply

αӻzαℓ мαнαנιя afzal 09:47, 17 March 2017 (UTC)

Иσт яєρℓу afzal 09:48, 17 March 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Afzal Mahajir (talkcontribs)

If

edit

If you would write article Mult account (or if there is such an article under another name) plz mention about it on a page Мульт by iwiki. Thanks! Carn 17:04, 9 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

merge Screen name (computing) pls

edit

Screen name (computing) = Username. ね?.--ZayZayEM 06:05, 15 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

not same thing. username is an account/unix thing, screen name is an AOL/IM thing —Preceding unsigned comment added by A plague of rainbows (talkcontribs) 15:33, 12 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
  Done. screen name (computing) now redirects to User (computing). --DavidCary (talk) 14:06, 21 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

whoami, who, and ...?

edit

Is there a command to see a list all existing user accounts, without having to look at /etc/passwd or the contents of /home ?
Well, maybe not:

File: coreutils.info,  Node: User information,  Next: System context,  Prev: Working context,  Up: Top

20 User information
*******************

This section describes commands that print user-related information: logins, groups, and so forth.

* Menu:

* id invocation::               Print user identity.
* logname invocation::          Print current login name.
* whoami invocation::           Print effective user ID.
* groups invocation::           Print group names a user is in.
* users invocation::            Print login names of users currently logged in.
* who invocation::              Print who is currently logged in.

-----Info: (coreutils.info)User information, 18 lines --All


Thanks in advance, --Jerome Potts (talk) 01:11, 15 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

/etc/passwd is definitive —Preceding unsigned comment added by A plague of rainbows (talkcontribs) 02:02, 15 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Cybernaut?

edit

Why does cybernaut redirect here? 86.140.69.123 (talk) 18:23, 19 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

I was wondering the same thing...five years later! 74.174.59.10 (talk) 14:12, 18 June 2013 (UTC)Reply
I've redirected it to cyberspace. Mindmatrix 14:25, 18 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

nom d'écran

edit

I think we should add nom d'écran (French for "screen name") to the list, as it is sometimes used in English newspapers in Europe. Any thoughts? --Thorwald (talk) 20:38, 3 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

About the issue of GUEST login.....

edit

The topic of GUEST account in the IT industry needs to be discussed thoroughly, based on the fact of

https://portfolio.umn.edu/guestLogin.jsp;jsessionid=97C4C654F7682F18EC80DE06BD42CAC0

https://mondo.su.se/portal/help/html/content.hlp?docId=guestlogin

http://scholar.google.com/scholar?as_q=Guest+login&num=10&btnG=Search+Scholar&as_epq=&as_oq=&as_eq=&as_occt=title&as_sauthors=&as_publication=&as_ylo=&as_yhi=&as_allsubj=all&hl=en&lr=&newwindow=1

--222.64.221.91 (talk) 03:48, 8 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

and

http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&lr=&newwindow=1&q=allintitle%3A+Guest+account&btnG=Search --222.64.221.91 (talk) 03:50, 8 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

http://www.homeshop.com.au/website/home.jsp

https://www.colesonline.com.au/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/CMLForwardViewCmd?storeId=10052&catalogId=10001&viewName=HomePageDisplay —Preceding unsigned comment added by 222.64.221.91 (talk) 04:00, 8 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&lr=&newwindow=1&q=%22operating+system%22+%22guest+account%22&as_ylo=2008&as_yhi=2009&btnG=Search --222.64.221.91 (talk) 04:04, 8 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&lr=&newwindow=1&q=service+%22guest+account%22&as_ylo=2008&as_yhi=2009&btnG=Search --222.64.221.91 (talk) 04:06, 8 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&lr=&newwindow=1&q=software+trial+%22guest+account%22&as_ylo=2006&as_yhi=2009&btnG=Search --222.64.221.91 (talk) 04:08, 8 May 2009 (UTC)Reply


Is there a question here?? I very much doubt a guest account would be a good idea for Wikipedia - it is very easy (and free) for anyone to sign up. However, to pursue this further, perhaps you would be better off raising the question at the help desk. Astronaut (talk) 18:38, 8 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
I agree that having an actual guest account isn't necessary for Wikipedia, much like having a physical steam locomotive isn't necessary for Wikipedia -- and the Wikipedia help desk is the appropriate place for further discussion of that topic.
However, I think Wikipedia needs an article *about* steam locomotives, and I think Wikipedia needs an article *about* guest accounts.
I think the above poster's point is that the idea of a "guest account" is mentioned enough times by reliable sources to be at least mentioned in this "User (computing)" article. (I agree, so I added a brief mention of "guest account" to the article). The concept of "guest account" may even have enough sources to give it the WP: Notability it needs for its own independent article.
Is there any other article more appropriate for explaining guest accounts? --DavidCary (talk) 11:44, 13 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Post merge discussion

edit

Thanks to User:Diego Moya for finishing up the merge of End-user (computer science) into this article. I went through and clarified some of the text and incorporated a lot of excessive see also links into the body. I am now done messing with how it was and I think the article is ready to be expanded further. We do need to check other related articles (like UML and software engineering concepts, access control schema, operating system architectures, etc) and make sure we are not duplicating content but only mentioning how it is related to an abstract user or a concrete end user and letting the links do the rest. References can also be improved greatly here. –Paul M. Nguyen (chat|blame) 15:38, 7 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

edit

In the intro there's the line:

In hacker-related contexts, such users are also divided into lusers and power users. Both are terms of degradation,[citation needed] but the latter connotes a "know-it-all" attitude.[citation needed]

I've never witnessed this before, especially the term "power users" being degrading. I know anecdotal data isn't evidence, but that statement also has no evidence to back it up. I vote for it to be removed.

Also, the power users category is probably used much more often outside hacker-related contexts, and in that case it's not degrading at all. For example, power users are often used as a user group in design or marketing.Dideler (talk) 22:43, 5 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

192.168.0.1 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 175.139.111.23 (talk) 01:21, 4 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

End user (without hyphen)

edit

Shouldn't "end user" be written without a hyphen, like End user? -- ChristopheS (talk) 13:45, 20 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Both practices are okay. Treat them per MOS:STABILITY. When you are using "end user", be careful not to cause ambiguity; e.g. "End user license agreement" means "terminate user license contract". "End-user license agreement" can only mean "the license agreement for the end-user". Best regards, Codename Lisa (talk) 01:37, 21 February 2014 (UTC)Reply
For clarification: I was referring to "end user" as a noun, outside the context of more complex compounds etc. See e.g. Collins English Dictionary, Oxford, Merriam Webster. "End-user license agreement" would mean "the license for the end user" (without a hyphen). --ChristopheS (talk) 09:24, 21 February 2014 (UTC)Reply
Yeah, but to me "end-user" is still better; "end user license agreement" could mean termination of a license agreement. — Dsimic (talk | contribs) 17:27, 21 February 2014 (UTC)Reply
My point was that you need to distinguish between "end user" as a noun on its own and "end user" as used in "end user" used in compounds. There is no ambiguity when "end user" is not part of a compound; no hyphen is needed here. You sometimes need hyphens to avoid ambiguity, e.g. in the following example from Constance Hale: "the little-used car v. the little used-car". Using a hyphen in "end-user license agreement" does not imply you need the hyphen outside such compounds. --ChristopheS (talk) 18:26, 22 February 2014 (UTC)Reply
Please have a look at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style § Hyphens instead of endashes, for example, or Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Archive 151 § En dashes rather than hyphens for both prefixed and suffixed adjective phrases. (2) – hyphens vs. en dashes vs. no/less/more hyphens always provides tons of seemingly endless and, of course, free fun. :) — Dsimic (talk | contribs) 19:25, 22 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Fake accounts

edit

I suggest that fake user accounts be covered by this article as well (or maybe on a separate article). Couldn't find anything on this subject in this Wikipedia, even though there are articles on the subject in other wikis (Italian, Portuguese etc.) —capmo (talk) 19:55, 20 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Ok Ayut patil (talk) 17:32, 17 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Change username

edit

who do I talk to about changing my username? AaronSand4605 (talk) 12:05, 6 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia:Changing_username ~Kvng (talk) 00:12, 20 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

History of the concept "user"

edit

This article could use a history section. I just came to this article to find out when the idea of a user "account" was first invented in a computer operating system. This information seems to be missing. My guess is, that it came around with maybe the IBM System 360? This may also involve Multi-user software and History of IBM mainframe operating systems. --Lasse Hillerøe Petersen (talk) 03:29, 7 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

user vs end user

edit

The article seems to be inconsistent: "A user is a person who utilizes a computer or network service." This statement excludes machine accounts to be users. And this is how the English language defines user. But then: "Some software products provide services to other systems and have no direct end users." Then the term end user is defined to distinguish between users and end users. But users are defined being the persons and no machines, so how do they distinguish between end users?

Furthermore, if a computer has a purpose, the users fulfilling the purpose could be seen as end users, the admins that ensure the computer is working are not "end users" as they are only ensuring the purpose can be achieved - so not clear the term "end user" makes much sense in here.

Or am I wrong? 195.212.20.242 (talk) 10:27, 1 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

We have a separate End user article which seems to agree with you. I would support edits that clarify that User (computing) is a superset of End user. ~Kvng (talk) 16:33, 5 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Down-Level Logon Name format?

edit

Username formats says that there are "Down-Level Logon Name format". Really? Shouldn't that be "Domain-Level Logon Name format"? User:Haraldmmueller 12:45, 23 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

That phrase in the article is sourced to MSDN and checks out. ~Kvng (talk) 13:58, 4 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

"User name policy" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit

  The redirect User name policy has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 2 § User name policy until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 15:40, 2 November 2024 (UTC)Reply